Neutral
I do believe 173 needs adjusting to bring up to speed with how the server works but ERT are not immune to the effects of 173. ERT is still a 1 hit kill from 173 but if ERT are smart enough to hide behind a shield they will br protected from 173 much like they are from other SCPs
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion is aimed at allowing Internal Security Directors to disable comms access to site personnel much like Site Administration and Site Command are able to. If the Internal Security Department are expected to help contain information...
Ask staff to check logs and set up the fridge so only select jobs can take from the fridges...
The number of CI main staff players doesn't matter, logs are logs and if someone has reason to request them it can be provided (screen shots of the logs most likely need SL approval but names...
This could be adjusted, any Senior Admin+ should be able to adjust energy levels and powers in VJE so when on the job if spawning with or given a reality bending swep the swep would adjust accordingly.
I am neutral with this. It would be nice for RsD CL4 to keep their CL4 status and have the...
Username: Critical
Your in-game name: James 'Critical' Krane
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:465806201
Previous rank: Senior Admin
Are you appealing a Staff resignation or blacklist: Resignation
Date of resignation: 13/07/2024
Prior to this, have you ever been demoted or resigned: I...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion is to change how the document signature system works on two fronts. The first being scipnet uploads. If a document is scanned to the scipnet there should be an option to sign the document and/or scan a copy of the signed document to...
What server you were banned on: SCP-RP (UK)
Your in-game name: James Krane
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:465806201
Ban Reason: Severe Toxicity
Date of ban: 13/04/2025
Who banned you: Super Admin Neptune
Ban length: 3 days
What will you do to stop this from happening again: I will refrain from...
Guys, i couldn't care less about one of the 12,000 suggestions Zen posted and was denied for being 5 suggestions in 1.
Opinions on the idea of NVGs being reviewed as stated in the suggestion would be much appreciated for Content Team to review and have player base opinions :)
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It intends on changing how NVGs work. Currently you can wear then with facility lights on or off and there is little effect to your vision with NVGs on and facility lights on.
I believe it would make sense for NVGs to essentially white-out your...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.