Recent content by M. 'Arcturus' Shepherd

+Support This guy is pretty cool. I've interacted with him in the past a few times, and he is always nice and professional. I'd say give him a chance.

Why are you applying for Internal Security Inspector? Nearly every day for the past three months, I have given everything that I have for the Research Department as an Executive, while part timing as a ISD Investigator. As of late, I have grown excessively bored of doing the same...

+Support Great guy to work with. My go to Consultant to speak with when discussing medical matters.

+Support Countering CI, already is a Major W. Allows SOP to combat CI so Research can do Research things.

Major Negative Support This change was needed. Low pop turned into a Mass RDM spree by D-Class. There is no RP potential with this by D-Class. They all have the same playstyle. Break out>Kill Foundation>Get Level 4 Cards>Rinse&Repeat. Want an example? This was during Low Pop before the change...

+Support Give this man the potential to enhance RP. He's a great guy.

I don't really know if F and UNGOC can call in care packages, but if they can. they should get this buff as well. If they do not, then I am going to have to -support this.

While I would also find this funny, I did specifically state that we don't want this to happen with the reimplementation. Any Special chemicals such as NHU, AMX etc would not affect SCPs. This would be for balancing purposes.

Minging players don't usually get banned. I see this first hand, as my department has one of the highest cases of minges (other than ETS, and even ETS minges don't get banned often, just receive verbal/physical warnings.) But going onto the original topic, I think it could work. I like it. It...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Now hear me out, I understand as to why injecting SCPs was removed. It was abused in the past, and it is a justifiable reason. However, I think we can reimplement this in one of two ways: The first way this could potentially be implemented is by...

If Coke vouches, I give a +support. (I have also had good interactions with him)

+Support, but my only thing is to try to pick up activity more.

+Support, but in red. Desmond is a great Director of Research. I have personally worked with him to make really good changes within the department, including alleviating some of the stress when he was the only director available on site. While it would suck seeing him go, he is a good candidate...

+Major Support I like Krennic. He is a great guy, very approachable and has the drive to get things done. He is one of the best, if not the best IA/ISD Directors of all time. He remains professional at all times, even when under severe pressure and being pulled in seven different places at...

+Major Support #BringBackThorn All jokes aside, Thorn is a really great guy. I worked with him while he was an Executive two years back. This man has commitment, and is a really great candidate for the position. He has unrivaled RP dedication, going above and beyond to set a standard. (I gave...