Search results

lol no it's not. Look at ECW/O-1 bunks for prime example. O-1 US lost it's bio scanner but UK still has it. US is factually worse in most ways. +Support

+Support Cooking.

-Support I agree with the thread thumper. Why are you gonna nerf one of the worst SCPs currently? We already have it where we basically only see 076, 682, and the reality benders breached, why make it worse?

Unironically sure. A1 and O1 USED to have the the mk8 as a side weapon anyway.

+Support

+Support Honestly wish Enforcement would get a different shotgun too. Us having the Nova where A-1 gets the shotgun we only get at commander is wild.

Seems to work just fine for E11 and NU7.

MULTIPLE times. We have a fuckton of clips if it.

My bad I was going off the MC&D's reality device that's 30k, because I am not paying 10GBP just to get a class to pay 5k in-game to kill a free class. Also, hume bubbles are ass especially for the desired goal. ur old news

Issue is, we've been told using scrantons before we absolutely know a TB is in the raid is metagaming. Despite IC knowing TBs are used by CI.

30k to have a chance at killing one guy:

Ay hold up, why's you change the suggestion? -Support Give back Banjo

Imma be real, this is hardly a nerf to either SCPs or the TB. 8837 can still kill them with most of it's kit TG can still kill with materialize, same for TB TB still has 500hp 100 armor plus a gun or knife most of the time All of them still can 1 hit kill anyone else on any chem that may...

None of them are "super op" they're really bad. Also the cynogen chlorine is like 12L of samples or more to make the 5L.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: [Either increase the damage/tick rate, or lower the needed chemicals for Gas Grenades.] Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: [Not that I know of] Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2)...

-Support Hate to not support but you were demoted from ECAC because you were inactive showing you weren't really intrested in the position and it's associated duties, why go for a higher position in this line?

-/+Support Needs more LARP focused position SRcl4 experience imo, not at all a bad choice tho.

+Support One of the most welcoming Site Managers I've met. Although he is Australian, so it only makes sense he's going down A-1/O-5 route.

+Support When it comes down to it, the only area Pawz is slightly inexperienced in is MTF Regiments, but speaking to them they don't tend to argue situations they're not absolutely certain in, which for a ECM and any other SC member is very important IMO. So that inexperience is nullified by...

Massive +Support Bro is one of the most experienced possible choices.