Search results

Does this include D-Class? You make a compelling argument. ...I agree that this specific issue is a problem and even if something were done about the scoreboard, you could always just find out from the SCP tab anyway. I'm an F main, but have played a decent amount of CI and I often see...

Yeah, it's almost as if we know how CI works internally and what's enforced, meanwhile everyone on the outside seems to just be basing their +Support off of... Idk, the name in tab list? Seems to just be "the fact that the player on the SCP holds a CI position and flagged on during a raid" and...

Exceedingly rare Houston L. You hate to see it. Firstly, this is liable to cause more metagaming the other way around - i.e. Only one or two SCPs are on and CI raid heading to HCZ; The natural instinct in that situation (even though all SCPs are supposed to be onsite at all times in terms of IC...

I think we should be able to start interdepartmental wars over being stopped from sampling :D

Fairly certain that this is IC policy and not something to make a suggestion on?

+Support I don't know why stash and inventories are so laggy, probably GLua shenanigans. I feel like they desperately need an optimistion pass and I believe there to be considerable incentive to do so.

A most rapturous applause for you. +Support

...This is really not necessary. If COs want to use the chat timestamps as guides to help with the raid timers, they can simply just... Use the chat. Like comms, or even just PM/whisper themselves. Then use that timestamp. There's no need for a command. -Support

+Support Full agree.

...They should?

...And the turrets in lobby would kill 966 before it gets to garage.

...What? If 966 got to surface, then turrets were down.

...You know, when I returned to UK to find E-11 in an awful place, it was kinda the equivalent of coming home to find it ablaze. I'm not really mad about it, I'm more disappointed than anything. And this was after I'd received messages mocking me over my handling of the roster. I agree that...

Well check this out, here in SCP, the suggestion just gets denied. :D

-Support I get the idea, but there's no real need for this.

I mean, I feel like this is more a bug report than a suggestion? Bear in mind that this is a feature that has been recently reworked and reintroduced to the server, so I imagine it's actively being monitored. +Support

...Eh? It hasn't been saving for me...

Major +Support I like the idea of being able to bug a room. It gives an intel objective (for DEA/CI/GOC raids, potentially planting a bug in a room to monitor it), as well as an extra, very realistic duty to AO of sweeping a room that a VIP intends to enter later for bugs. And of course, has...

Just joined Nu7, so I can confirm that at least the Nu7 Operative job does not spawn with a bodycam. I firmly agree. It might be worth just going through which combatives spawn with a bodycam and reworking this suggestion into a general giving more combatives bodycams for these reasons...

I mean to be fair, minges already have CL3. My very first warning on the server was for hacking out SCPs as a Sr. Researcher.