Search results

Let 'em cook.

I'm not really an authority on this subject, but I imagine CT & the devs might reasonably appreciate anything that could help them flesh out a good implementation that they'd be happier pushing forward with, than without. 🤷‍♀️ And also the knowledge that the community still wants X thing.

I'm reminded of the 106/953/682 fight. That's a good termination log IMO. Fun read. I also like the potential idea of, Foundation steals a Neuro Controller, sticks it on an SCP. CI captures an SCP, sticks a Neuro Controller on it. F & CI then basically have a Pokémon fight :skull:

Place D-Class TB at the top of the Chain of Command, but only when the server is above 100 players.

HE'S BACK! +Major Support + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Excellent GM with a strong event style & a heavy focus on RP - Was in fact, part of the inspiration for my applying to GM, back when I did. + Should be good for it, honestly. The GM toolkit has a bunch of...

Dead man's switch bodycam that would contextually do something like "upload the last 30 seconds of footage on user death" IC. Since GenSec unethically killing D-Class is an IC issue, this would provide a way to capture mistreatment of D-Class (if they're not resisting and compliant, but get...

Nah, make it a shared job between CI & GOC so only one faction gets use of the infil job at a time :skull:

Wdym N/A 😭 https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/add-scp-scp-specific-interactions-for-abilities-and-enable-friendly-fire-via-that.22664/#post-156887 Anyway, everything that I said there, also realistically more-or-less also applies here 1:1. +Support

This is quite good. The concept of highly configurable dispensers is essentially the natural evolution of what I said before in another suggestion about needing a second tier of dispensers, but with greater flexibility and more fluidly allows integrating future content - I imagine the bodycams...

I like the general idea, but I feel like being able to determine the exact status of each subsystem is a little too strong - I also recall things like this being suggested before and being denied, but I never really personally agreed with the denial reasons. Maybe instead of exact, perfect...

The change was just reverted with an announcement that additionally stated the intention to make the normal bodycams CL1 from a dispenser, at a later date.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Create a new variant of Spy Cards specifically for CI DCs and CI DCs only, that allows them to disguise as specific humanoid SCPs, e.g. TGs, 049, 076, 106, 323, 427-2, 7722, 8837 - Specifically not 073 or 8854, for reasons I elaborate on later, but...

IMO it would make sense for AO & O5/EC not to spawn with covert bodycams if there was some other way to get them. But putting it in the regular dispenser behind a clearance level feels too accessible. I think what we need here is a second tier of dispenser that only exists in certain locations...

The change note seems very strange to me: ...How exactly is making ISD RP harder and forcing everyone to get bodycams from dispensers an enhancement to RP? Make no mistake, I've pushed bullshit RP enhancements in the past, ask Event Team - But if this qualifies as an RP enhancement, I should be...

I still feel like the previous denial reason somewhat applies... Ish?: Even though I personally disagree with the given reasoning, I can understand the sentiment of it being too unfair towards reality benders/8837 and adversely affect their experience. There are circumstantial differences...

I don't know if it's still in place, but on UK we have Zone Jurisdiction Policy which does basically this.

Pretty sure @Zen suggested this exact thing in the past: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/scranton-ras-prevent-targeting-people-within-their-range.21569/

Good. It risks making MC&D "the sampling job," however it's a primarily non-combative edge (at least, until you start digging into the implications of how the extra chems will be used) that they can have over everyone else, that they are simply allowed more samples and thus there is greater...

+Support You could not live with your own failure. Where did that bring you? Back to me. Honestly, I'd be fine with some kind of halfway measure at this point - I just always found it really weird that the specific structure is an explicit server rule. Hell, we have SCP-RP Discussion now. It...

+/- Neutral