Search results

@Zen

realistic

[AO-ISD] Go brrrr >AO don't need ISD comms just to talk to ISD Refer to above. ??????????

The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65. Hello, @Zen Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment request...

"uhm, I wasn't hostile, you had no reason to kill me"

And that would be valid... I more refer to every single SCP working together despite never meeting once, tell me how on earth 9k would work with TG. Yeah, because I don't care about players who just want to breach.

If you can't Roleplay just say so.

God no. Yes Tranqs are useful, however adding them as a perma would lead to abuse. They are on restricted jobs so that if you abuse it, they can be taken away.

Not the job of a Containment unit.

God please.

Oh dear.

If that's possible it'd be ideal.

People trying to Roleplay >>>>>>>> SCPs players just wanting to breach and kill.

I have long thought of doing this, and this can be done IC, however it risks abuse. It could turn into a free tool for a disguise for example.

Content will have to decide which SCPs can attack, 096 is a massive issue of course. And maybe SCPs could have a special interaction in 106 realm. Being brothers is a solid reason to work together,

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion aims to add the following: > SCPs will be able to damage other SCPs [Content] > SCPs will not be allowed to Team without RP Interaction/Reason [Rule] Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

Nah. Remove NU7 Jugg when CI TB is removed.

Awwww man. Take care Jordie, damn good Captain o7

Get back to studying.

No rules have been put in place yet, give SL and the Dev the chance to actually gather feedback and change/adjust this.