Search results

+Support My Concerns have been sufficiently adressed, I believe Elias would make for a competent addition to the GM team, any remaining concerns would be dealt with during his trial period. Lastly, a general point: You leave large parts of your events very open in this application...

-Support This suggestion does not fit the purpose of MC&D on the server, nor does it suit the on-wiki depiction of MC&D. The on-server MC&D is not intended to be a faction with a permanent presence, but is a simple job with unique perks available for roleplay and earning money. The job is...

-Support Hello Steve, I cannot support the Current Iteration of this Application for a variety of Reasons. Ill give my thoughts on each Segment of the Application. Example Missions: These are all very vague, but not only that. I strongly suspect that some of these have been written by AI...

-Support Hello, Firstly, the formatting on this is not ideal, the text is barely legible on the forum background. Some of the Ideas would require work. I find that the Paratech one is very simmilar to many other applications which have a simmilar concept, id avoid relying on MC&D selling...

-Support The Current Iteration of the Application is very shallow and uninteresting, thus i feel unable to support it.

+Support After the revisions, I belive this application meets our standards, and any concerns I have will be addressed during a trial period. Best of Luck.

Hello Flare, before I begin writing my full response, you mentioned having notable PAC3 experience, would you be able to attach examples of this to your Application? I think this would help speak in your favour significantly. Thanks.

+Support After some revision and elaboration, I belive this application meets our standards, and concerns I still hold will likely be addressed during a trial phase. More General points: Now, I dont see the issue with small, inconsequential events that just give parts of the playerbase...

This.

Happened to me too, All good.

-Support Hello Chocho, While I am happy to see you finished your application, there are a few things that make me feel unable to confidently support it. Now, onto more general issues with this application The Writing is very "Hello, do the thing." "Yes." which is very stale and uninteresting...

It Happens

-Support Your Application is far too short for me to be able to confidently support it, and some of the Events are not particularilly imaginative , such as the SCP-096 mass breach.

-Support This Application is far too short and simple for me to feel like i am able to confidently support it. Please significantly expand the events beyond descriptions of an SCP, and branch out from just "X scp is in pinewood now" which you do not do enough of.

-Support The Application is far too short for me to be able to feel confident in supporting it. Please significantly expand the events described in your application, one of your "3 events" which are meant to be the biggest events in your application is one single sentence.

You are correct, its just Gen+1, but the writing on this page calls it paratech and i didnt want to go "Ahktually" about the overuse of terms when my point was more : "the GOC does not give out its technology to its only real political rival whom they are in a cold war with"

Its Crazy. Bit strange of the GOC to just volunteer paratech like that.

Hey, just wanted to say that SCP 2140 does not convert people into loyal foundation members from then on, it does it "retrocausally" meaning, anyone who sees a full instance of it will have always been a loyal Foundation Employee, rewriting all of history to reconstruct their life to suit this...

thats crazy

tragic. o7