I’m not even a huge fan of this suggestion as I prefer there would be that the mayor and rangers were placed there to control info breaches and they are debriefed on that kind of stuff over the RP which this suggestion would make which would be /oc OMG THIS MILLITARY BASE HAS A BUNCH OF SCARY...
replying to the person who mentioned PAM let me ask you this what “surface rp” are you talking about? I certainly don’t see surface RP. I was in PAM at one point and my main goal was building up relations. I attempted to set up meetings and it became clear to me there was no intentions of...
Clearly things have changed I was told rangers on USA server would never get armoury yet now we have. The two options are this suggestion or actually have them know what they have to hide otherwise it wouldn’t make sense to not say anything or investigate about the info.
The types of players you listed are quite accurate. I really wish there was more stuff to do with civilians so people don’t resort to doing random stuff like that. I do not play Ranger/Mayor anymore but some things that I think could work is:
- Mayor elections (I would recommend server wide...
Not gonna argue with you but you fail to understand infill policy, I had auth from a commissioner to do a infill then when I said on comms I would be doing a infill (notifying gensec) your chief said, "[COMMS GSD] Security Chief Jack 'Cornelious' Edwards: Do not attempt to assassinate the TB...
Yo Tylenol smith here this is never going to be changed after my many talks with people because they treat civilians has pretty much npcs in the combat server +support
thank you everyone for all the feed back, regardless if I get accepted or not I thank you guys for seeing a change in me and basing me off what you hope I can do in the future. Thanks everyone!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.