Search results

Suggestion Denied Hi @ScavBane , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Whilst we do agree that SCP-082 is an interesting SCP that deserves more love, currently as you will see on the...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Sule Goodman , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Whilst we appreciate the though that has gone into this suggestion, Content Team believe that an additional 966...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Zen , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Content Team see this proposed change as a potential RP limitation. Mis-use of SCPs, as stated in this thread, are not...

Suggestion Denied Hi @JustinSayne , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): As stated in the changelog that can be found here, breachvotes were disabled as part of a test which is actively...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Glazzing , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. This is clearly a troll post, so going to be closing this down now as the other one was already denied. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.

Why do all of these meme suggestions keep appearing? Denied.

Hi there @NapkinJack Please follow the format and edit your suggestion to actually suggest something, rather than using a content suggestion as a platform to complain or this will be denied. You have 12 hours to do this.

So why add extra, non-natural breaches on top of that? Especially ones that can be repeated over and over again if, lets say, SCP-079 is hacking out SCPs once it's been breached by a D-Class or Deep Cover?

Because it's extremely disruptive during low-pop where there aren't enough combatives to respond, halting / stagnating RP for everyone else on site until it's sorted.

Suggestion Up For Further Discussion Hi @Jeremy Bennett , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to put your suggestion up for internal discussion. This is due to the fact that we are dicsussing some of the finer details about the changes you...

Suggestion Up For Further Discussion Hi @Charles "Ze" Whitmee , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to put your suggestion up for internal discussion. Specific parts of this suggestion would require NL involvement and approval. This has been...

Suggestion Up For Further Discussion Hi @Lonix , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to put your suggestion up for internal discussion. This is due to the fact that we are trying to ascertain from the developers how possible a solution like...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Zen , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Due to the rarity of riots (not to be confused with Code 2s), Content Team have come to the conclusion that the investment...

Suggestion Up For Further Discussion Hi @Marvin Garden , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to put your suggestion up for internal discussion. This is so we can discuss the re-working of the animations and sounds you mention above, but also...

Other/Miscellaneous Hi @Joshbond , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Due to something similar being accepted previously, and you requesting for this to be closed this will now be closed. Thanks you!

Suggestion Denied Hi @Dan Roth , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Handcuffs already currently require you to be close enough to the person for a couple of seconds to be able to...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Qidn , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): GENSEC currently have access to enough Tranquiliser guns via Response Unit, Captain and CoS. We do not see the need to...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Evil , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Content Team would not be looking to remove SCP-073 at this current moment in time. We have recently accepted a...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Dark Soldier , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s): Part of this denial reason links to the fact that the hitboxes for these new suggested model would need work doing...

Suggestion Approved Hi @Archangel , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.