Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to partially accept this suggestion. We intend on expanding the definition of this rule.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. (Note) We are looking into ways to improve RP for surface jobs.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. The reason for denial is because we have already partially accepted this suggestion on a different post.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank you for taking the time to write this suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank you for taking the time to write this suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. The reason for denial is because we do not believe the main issue itself is CI hopping onto the SCP during a raid etc, more so that staff need to be focusing on...
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to write this suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to partially accept it. You can not use the ERT Phone IC to determine the amount of SCP's breached. To combat this we will likely be doing a content change to the ERT Phone.
~...
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Reason for denial is Content Team will be resolving this issue through development.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. This is a in-character complication, and you need to speak to your SA/SC. If any issues with E-11 forcing you to dispose of chemical samples happen though, please reach...
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. The reason for denial is because you have some ability to do so, but you would have to have RP knowledge as a D-Class about how to recontain the anomaly.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
~ Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. To be clear the reason for denial isn't because we have an issue with what your saying but more so, that what you mentioned is a loophole. We are in agreement that when...
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
~Johnathan Doe
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to deny it. We are currently already making changes to this system, which is the reason for the denial.
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to partially accept it. We will be adding in guides and making changes to where players are limited as far as positions on surface in regard to camping other factions bases...
Thank you for taking the time to make a rule suggestion. The SSL Team has voted on your suggestion and have decided to partially accept it. Again, thank your for taking the time to make the suggestion.
~Johnathan Doe
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.