Search results

Note on "randomly dancing", can be argued failRP a lot of the time. Just call a sit.

For quick clarification: The bodycams record nothing. Their purpouse is to allow you to use clips you get with software IC.

The only benefit l have seen argued of the bodycam change itself is very weak. +Support If you're going to make something worse, at least let everyone use it conveniently.

Guts..... my guy...... Not all CL4's don't spawn with it (somehow), and why would combatives NOT have bodycams.... Add DEA to the list +soup

Shouldn't be used, yet it's used so much that this suggestion was made. The impersonation would also do the exact opposite, making the person feel safe OOC, and therefore would share more info IC than they should (a possibility). It's lose-lose unless all names would be shuffled above the person.

Would the person not be able to just impersonate another person? Unless the people who see the disugised know the person with the name isn't on, you could get away with it. This would most probably violate naming conventions, so your alternative is to set a name that nobody has. This means that...

-Support I already can't trust literally any CL4 with the simple task of NOT opening two of the biggest defences we have once SCPs get to EZ, letting Nu7 do this would make the situation worse. Furthermore, I have heard Nu7 go from requesting to yelling at me to open the door, with no regard...

I'd say if ISD get it, DEA should get it too (infobreaches/contact with GOI's), +Support regardless tho

Chem banks? Last I checked, chem banks are personal, they cannot be shared with others. If there was a shared chem bank, logs would already exist. If you are talking about chem fridges, logs already exist for those, and can typically be only opened by few jobs.

This is the warfunds addition that is fabled and somewhere in the Github (altough it might have been deleted so good thing this) , so that section is already in the works (*should be*). But these ARE good suggestions ON TOP OF/REPLACING what options are meant to selected. (But DEA getting...

As a special agent, -support, I've never had issues with the gun in my 1.5 years with the WL. While some CI guns are a tad bit OP, I personally don't think the appropriate action is to change our weapon, it's fairly good already.

Quite a couple people seem to have not read the entire suggestion The suggestion removed the chemicals IN CHARACTER, as in /me takes chemicals, as Cade quite clearly said. No +/-, just thought it was an interesting observation. But I will say, /me takes chemicals has always been okay which this...

U didn't mention me -support Get back over here

We love colours + Support (Maybe more shades than having CI go full green and GOC full blue/purple but the idea is W)

Me when I make a comment about the fact that this will probably be abused in a couple ways, including, as Marvin put it, through entity lag, and I get immediately blasted for "Having a hard on for GENSEC". More ironic is the fact that my point had enough validity where the poster decided that it...

God I love it when, - support, not needed. The amount of feedback given in that is tremendous! (Except you Froggo, thank you very much for your reasons!) Personally, I agree that the raid cooldown should increase as on UK (unsure if US has the same) for a period of two-three hours every day, it...

This would not only undermine medics, but also the role of the fracture medicine itself. It's clearly been designed to be harder to carry, taking up a 2*3 slot in your inventory for just the one. Why do that if you can just take swig of a chemical? Also, this would most probably always land into...

One issue I can see quickly from this, some dclass will get on super early, stockpile a shit ton of weapons, hide them, and then use them at a time with higher players -support , no thanks

You got me at "easy kills across surface"..... -support