The issue isn't that they need a buff, they are just non-existant in some key points across the site in which an 008 breach could easily get slowed. I wouldn't know the best spots to put one, but in all honestly one in the D block airlock area would actually be nice as it separates D class from...
I figured the additonal bio doors would be the most frowned upon suggestion of the 3, but I do understand where you guys are going. Thank you for all that have written responses!
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Fews things
1. More biohazard doors in key locations. Would block 008-2 instances from getting across the site, mainly LCZ - EZ, in record time.
2. E-11 biohazard unit getting override to said biohazard doors.
3. E-11 "Containment Specialist" getting...
- support
There is no roleplay in an 008 breach
I don't even know how a D class IC would
Get access to a cl 4 biometric, learn about 008 and its location, get into 008 without setting any suspicion, cycle the airlock or have someone assist them.
+ support
I havent been on as im on LOA, but i will say when i was heavily active, 079 being meta'ed wasn't common. I will say, the concept of "he didnt respond" should NOT be a valid way to determine if hes breached or not. But normally, finding a door that broke open, or a camera that just...
MTF DONT SPAWN WITH THEM- they took back like all of the combatives that spawn with them. I understand your pain but I can tell you right now it’s not getting accepted.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
I believe that clearing spores should give SCP (or) combat XP. Dependent on the size and type of spore (large , spike, etc) and if it’s a nest or not.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that...
+\- support
Personally I think him going through regular doors are fine. But I would argue BULK doors (or other heavily fortified doors) he shouldn’t be able to get through.
wrong tool that im referring too, but okay. The tool im referring too is the infection scanner, it checks for spores that are spawning / developing. The infection scanner you currently are holding , is what is used to test an individual for infection, not to check for spores.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
I am suggesting that the SCU loadout , to also include a "Infection scanner" tool, the same tool biohazards and ERT have to scan for 008 spores.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that I have...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.