Search results

can we just give strike team the shields that break doors, just like door charges? Anyways +/-Support, I see the vision but that would give CI 6 door charges, and they would be able to go basically anywhere within Floor 3, ECO, or SA.

-Support

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/blacklist-amnesty-edric-coltman.34164 Wasn't directly blacklisted by NL, but the anti-cheat got him (Despite him doing it manually). Still quite a weird way to be blacklisted because it is possible for people to do it.

Sounds like a lot of dev work, whuch probably means it'll end up on the backlog for eternity. Elsewise +Support

Guiles dont require approval on MTFs

NOT MY FAVOURITE ECM o7, stay safe and cool

-Support

-Support

+/-Support From my time in CI, this has never been a major issue. I mean sure, DC's can access them whenever, but that is barely ever useful. I have no issue with the idea - Just that it seems like something that would end up on the eternal backlog due to a lack of necessity.

I disagree with having to hack all the turbines to breach certain SCPs, as you shouldn't have to cause even more disruption, but hacking 1 or 2 is fine. May kill US CI though, idk how much difficulty they have with these things. They should struggle, I don't see why they shouls get it off the bat.

thought you meant just being in the Hume Bubble, not the dimension itself. Whoops! +Support The instability of the dimensions would be something cool and immersive that makes sense, and also a counterbalance to being able to summon a portal out of your pocket.

12 is such an arbitrary number wtf

How would this interact with Hume Bubbles sending you to one of the dimensions?

-Support It is a really simple way of roleplay for people to just interact with SCP's, and them to get knowledge on what SCP's are breached. Getting rid of this just removes a layer of roleplay for no real reason. Also, how would silent breaches work, or breaches the Foundation itself isn't...

cannot believe im so cool i got an honourable mention long live roleplay, still here if you want to talk about anything or just chill

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/modify-isds-elastic-restraints.34969/#post-253439 The above suggestion is just this, but less extreme. -Support Instant cuffs are too powerful.

"Shame Doyle, Shame" has to be the actual funniest shit you've ever said, and I'm half sure it was unintentional. Going to miss you, high tier Skonger and really friendly to talk to. Hope you do well, and hopefully we talk occassionally. Stay safe.

+/-Support leaning towards +Support +Support Going through the negatives first, I feel as though the application could use a bit more work as others have said. I also think it's a tad strange that you're using Doyle as your ECM character (An individual who doesn't like the Committee), which...

/me screams

Gasp, 20th Assistant max slot suggestion. I wonder if we'll accept this one. +Support