Search results

  1. GMAN0289

    Content Meeting Discussion [Content Team Thread] Community Ideas and Feedback - E-11

    Site Security is built to handle all internal site matters when it comes to containment and countering GOIs. If E-11 were to be stationed on site it would be a small contingent not the entire regiment. It makes more sense for Site Security to handle all of these matters even with the numerous...
  2. GMAN0289

    Content Meeting Discussion [Content Team Thread] Community Ideas and Feedback - E-11

    I would agree with having that sentiment if E-11 was not structured the way it was right now. Right now they are Containment Units except a regiment not an elite response task force.
  3. GMAN0289

    Content Meeting Discussion [Content Team Thread] Community Ideas and Feedback - G.O.C

    Honestly most of the GOC's issues is surface is shit. Sucks to fight on and there is nothing interesting to actually do up there.
  4. GMAN0289

    Content Meeting Discussion [Content Team Thread] Community Ideas and Feedback - E-11

    E-11 has to niche of a role on the server to have something to constantly do. Honestly just combine E-11 and GSD into a regiment and make it actual Site Security.
  5. GMAN0289

    Rule Suggestion "private" communication rules

    Neutral There is a way to view private communications via the Floor 3 server room, with that being said it is very annoying to actually get the ability to use this. I do see this being very annoying to normal players as well.
  6. GMAN0289

    Partially Accepted Fix/Tweak the MK18 (GSD Captain Primary)

    What does this suggestion change/add/remove: The goal of this suggestion is to introduce QOL changes to the MK18 since their are some issues with it right now. First and foremost the biggest issue is the fact that putting any sight on the weapon makes it more frustrating to use. This is because...
  7. GMAN0289

    Denied TB Changes... Here we go again!

    guys lets nerf CI again
  8. GMAN0289

    Network Leadership required Making so that Site Command Roles will have terms (05/EC)

    6 month term for just -1 and ECC, each department gets 1 vote to keep them or remove them. Already a better suggestion tbh. Edit: Not throwing shade, but 1 month is way to short. -support
  9. GMAN0289

    [USA] Mace's Security Captain Application

    These allegations are not TRUE!
  10. GMAN0289

    Denied New E-11 job idea

    Neutral While the concept is very much understandable server balance wise to help scp vs e11 combat this can be a huge disruption to type blue players like CI which have already been nerfed to the ground. A better solution would be a chemical that would help disrupt their ability to target you...
  11. GMAN0289

    Denied E-11 Containment Specialist Rework

    Neutral I can understand the frustration of low pop breaches having all the doors broken, but there is also RP taken away from tech experts/engineers.
  12. GMAN0289

    [US] (Returning Player) Maxwell "Arcturus" Shepherd's Executive Researcher Application

    They let you name yourself (Returning Player) Maxwell "Arcturus" Shepherd? I thought they were cracking down on naming cons.
  13. GMAN0289

    [USA] Mace's Security Captain Application

    OOC Section Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:244971374 Discord name: GMAN0289 For how long have you played on CG SCP: 3 Years Age: 22 In what country are you located?: USA Time zone: EST Character name(s): A. Mace Civilian name: Bailiff What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): USA Do you...
  14. GMAN0289

    Denied Let's nerf CI again!!!

    no this makes more sense for like site 9, an real traction this post gets is not real.
  15. GMAN0289

    [USA] Vaati's Site Advisor Application

    Neutral While he dose have senior CL4 experience it is in GOC and not Foundation which are two very different factions. That being said holding roles is not a defining factor, but it dose help prove capability.