Search results

Honestly, the only reason leaderboard info should ever be used in relation to disguise is in sits. Otherwise, the other person thinking you're disguised should not really be able to get any real info from the leaderboards - And instead find out properly IC.

I was going to say that ERT could just be added to E-11 and/or MTF groups, however that's metagamable by other factions, as they could flag onto Foundation roles, get ERT, see what the E-11/MTF frequency is, then use that knowledge on GOI factions And since this seems pretty difficult to...

Hmm. How about an armour threshold of 100, instead of 50? As in, max armour prevents/mitigates tranqing (at least, 100 is max for most jobs, this would just be stronger for juggs since IIRC they start with more?) It makes 0 sense that armour would be able to stop tranqs?

Very similar to this from last month: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/966-rebalance.33167/ I don't think the opinion here will have changed. Compared to what I say in that thread though, mine kind of has? I'm actually okay with HP reduction to that HP range, if there are multiple...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion asks for tranquilisers to only take effect if the individual hit by them has 50 armour or less. Optionally also separate the tranq gun into two SWEPs, the "weaker tranq gun" that operates with the above behaviour under all conditions...

Feels like more of an event suggestion than a content suggestion.

So this is kinda minor QoL thing, but before the update, you could create a specific quote by highlighting a section of text in the post that you want to quote - Then a little 'reply' button would appear, you hit it and it creates a quote in your reply, with only what you highlighted. This...

Ah, that wasn't clear to me.

+Major Support Yeah - You kinda need both of these together. If you have just the door damage changes, then you get people breaking doors unrelated to getting to their target, but it's hard to tell whether or not it's intentional or because they don't have an accurate idea of where their target...

You guys aren't thinking big enough, here. +Support, BUT give CI a way of obtaining tranqs

+/- Neutral, leaning +Support-ish I feel like this might be denied for metagaming already being a thing that's policed by staff - However the problem with that is that this is a form of metagame that's not easily policeable (unless it's extremely blatant, like the person said they used the...

This is actually my least favourite 'feature' of the forums, IMO - One reason being that in subforums like suggestions where your post cooldown is displayed near the bottom, if you scroll slightly too far while trying to check it, it loads the next page of threads and you have to scroll down again.

I'm talking more for tests where it's like, they're throwing D-Class in with things like 173, 682, 049, etc. Like, very dangerous, very scary, very threatening things.

Counterpoint: Every D-Class test where a D-Class is in danger is FailRP on part of the D-Class, because the D-Class "didn't value their life realistically enough and placed themselves in danger too casually." There's no winning here.

+Support

+Major Support Honestly kicking myself for not realising this, of course. Yeah.

+Major Support This sounds insane, but the more I think, this is actually just the natural counter to surrendering D-Class outside D-Block being constantly killed. Like... Fuck it. Just make everything surrounding D-Class behaviour an IC issue. Staff have better things to do, honestly. I think...

Things like this I think would require regional stuff to be set up - I get that with the big panic button change, we lost being able to specialise panic buttons; I think it would make sense to have a kind of panic button that gives an approximate location - I know there was discourse about...

+/- Neutral Ambitious, but otherwise interesting. I have no strong feelings about this idea.

I think the breach queue itself should be on a queue. Just keep adding queues to it. The new CN innovation, the Breach Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue Queue