Search results

I am in support of this, as long as the skull couldn't be picked up / gravity gunned. The idea of a faction just yoinking the skull, feeding a civilian to it, and then sampling it - without any RP or anything - is sadly more sad and annoying to me than the idea of the RP this would produce...

+ Support Walking is infinitely cooler than running.

Interesting. Frankly I'm not sure about this as a player role, not tons of RP opportunities with it frankly, but I do think the ability to actually punish players (job bans for example) who act as poor MC&D agents would be good.

Hmmm. Tranq guns are a unique weapon. I think spreading tranq guns over too many different roles is a poor idea, however I can at least consider sergeants having them as there is only 2 slots and it makes sense.

Within that same page it says the words "Most research staff, field agents, and containment specialists hold a Level 2 security clearance." - this would suggest that the majority of researchers, DEA, and Containment units should hold CL2s, despite generally holding CL3s in-game. It also states...

Funny CI nerf. This is for everyone, "Clearance Level" in "Lore" is the most unbalanced and under utilised things. Barely ever are MTF actually described as having any number based clearance level in lore since the system doesn't make a lot of sense. Anyone with even the slightest knowledge of...

The influx of revolvers would ruin the value of it, I think, but also like I love em.

The idea that wanting to not be forced into spending a significant portion of your free time on a specific role just to stay in a video game regiment is an insane "game/life balance problem" is stupid. Not everyone has as much free time as you, or not everyone wants to spend as much free time...

Go play E-11, please. Even if you're not just running at an SCP with a beam to slow it, you may still not have a beam when it is actually needed.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Title is clear - but this would add a Containment Beam and Scranton Reality Anchor to all E-11 roles, currently they all spawn with SCP Restraints (from what I can tell, but if not, add them too) What exactly it would add to each role (at least from...

I + support

Wow +support I love spawning with a full machine gun as a non-combative who would never fire a gun in their life - if content team denies this it will only reduce RP. The old one was blocked for the reason of: And although this was a while ago and content has changed a lot, I think to frankly...

PAC3 Denied Hello @JesterX3, We have decided to deny your PAC3, please contact myself or a member of the SL team for further reasoning. Thank you, - Blob.

RP is RP and I'd never go against this - but I'm not sure whether putting the equivalent of a cat/dog into 914 would make it smart enough to talk.

@Peter the Second Please make sure to use the template for your suggestion.

Sometimes things exist, and it is not cherrypicking to state that. Frankly it's closer to survivorship bias, more CI SCPs so I see more CI SCPs break rules - maybe the rule breaks actually wouldn't go down if CI were blocked from doing this, who knows. All I know is that 75% of the time I've...

Official + Support from Blob. Frankly, I believe a reduction in rule breaks (from teaming, metagaming, FailRP) would occur if this rule was in place.

This is an in-character issue and should mostly be brought up in an in-character capacity. Although having a suggestion to limit the IC players ability to stop sampling is interesting, I don't believe it would promote any RP.

If you find out in-character then you can do it in-character... Although no D-Class should be killing themselves to recontain anomalies SCPs like 106 or 096.

Going to be honest and say I understand where this is coming from and why, but I don't like it. Above is the 2 parts of the suggestion that show my dislike for it, partially. I don't hate this, and I think TS is kind of really annoying and bad, but having pre-written communications would...