Search results

A quick example of this could be where this is used for a day where teamspeak is disabled and only radios may be used so people can get a feel for the rule change temporarily and see their actual opinion from there. It also helps keep content fresh without too much work (full updates wouldn’t be...

-Support I don’t see any point in this change and it’s just going to cut roleplay storylines short and I honestly don’t see a single benefit here. The most it’s going to do is allow more people to apply for a full time job for a month, which barely anybody has the motivation to do already, not...

Some of this feels AI generated and you haven’t gone into depth about how you would do these events behind the scenes nor much about preparation. Additionally, you didn’t provide a map link for the map change event nor is the paragraphing well organised, but these are easy fixes. I’m not gonna...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion will add one day a week (up to NL/CT to decide) where an experimental feature is added. This could include a new role which is under discussion for balance and fairness such as Nu-7 jugg (before it was added full time). These would...

Not a fan of most of the ideas here but some of them aren’t horrible. +/- Neutral support

Grow a garden mod

Nah let’s add bubbles and sway when you move them around in your stash. 8k rendering sounds good? +Support

i was gone for like 5 months :freeze:

i dont know how half the people in the community instantly recognised me before i even used my voice 😭 but i guess thats something uh im gonna be playing for the summer ig and roleplaying then im off to boarding school or something for the next year

I mean tbh, GOC were meant to save surface roleplay or something but from what I've heard on the UK at least, they are just constantly at war with foundation and the faction is dying because most of them are awful at combat. GOC have their roleplay sometimes, sure, but its severely limited and...

I kinda wonder how this would work with SCPs though, wouldn't this severely nerf something like 939, 076 or 173's speed? Albeit, 173 is still fast when not sprinting.

A few suggestions just like this have been accepted in the past, like 30-40 players minimum. Edit: Found one here https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/remove-being-able-to-hack-out-scps-below-50-players.29714/page-2#posts

Add a few new things imo - Stamina chemical or some energy bar (self explanatory, however this might counteract the point of the suggestion) - Make certain combatives run slightly faster and/or have a higher stamina capacity when there is an active code (C1 for nu7, C3,C5 for E11, etc)

goodbye, Rizzxin... o7

Funny enough, you can drive up near-vertical inclines if you drive in reverse. You cant even get close to that if you drive forward. Something to do with the cars having "backseat engines" or something. Anyways, you can technically do this already if you directly own the vehicle and just...

I dont think every keycard should have overrides, or we might as well just give the keycard itself override, meaning if someone takes it, it retains its override abilities and you can access all the zones needed.

Ngl I meant to write surface SCPs but I somehow forgot about that part. 323 and 8854 are CL3 according to clearance guide.

Aw shucks. Guess that nu7 enlisted cant capture surface anymore if they dont know they exist! -Support I dont see any point in this regardless and it takes attention away from nu7. Might as well just give AO officers and commanders CL2, because do they really need a CL4? O5 council? More like...

I mean there is already a trading channel on the discord where people do this. Why not add it ingame too as another OOC thing just like the trading channel.

Dont worry guys, the S&W 1998 revolver or whatever it is only deals like 10,000 dmg per shot!