Search results

+Support Makes sense to me. I trust Johnson's instinct on this.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: When an SCP is no longer being dragged (whether via R (? I forget what the default key is) or are tethered to a fixed point), change cuff behaviour as follows: The longer they are left unattended, reduce cuff resistance - Eventually letting it get to...

I mean disguise abuse feels sensible as a rule - However, how on earth do you enforce this? Plus it introduces confusion about whether or not a given order as valid, undermining that whole authority of regiments and such is not really something you want

You're asking for a rule change. Content don't resolve rule suggestions. SSL+ do. I agree that it makes things easier from a player perspective and is an easier solution compared to devising a content change, - But the primary point being that Content don't have to brainstorm ideas for this by...

...Did you read the rest of what I wrote after the first line?

Yeah, the 079 counterstrat as shown above has basically been made completely ineffective; I do agree on the premise that it's extremely weird to just... Leave a highly dangerous SCP in a room- Realistically that wouldn't happen and you can really only do this because you know it's a game. My...

+O5-4 'The Troll'

I feel like everyone's reacting as if jugg's gonna get infinite sprint. It's probably gonna end up being a weaker version of 076's mechanic, which is honestly fine.

There's bugs from there being a pic without a flagged 096? I know that it's possible because they can just randomly spawn and have had many instances where I've flagged on as 096 and there was already a pic spawned, but I didn't know it caused issues Making it impossible to destroy I think is a...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Currently, any active 096 picture is removed the moment 096 is bucketed. This suggestion asks for this specific function to be removed, allowing any extant 096 picture to remain after 096 is bucketed to be subsequently swept for and destroyed by...

+Support Makes sense to me

+Support This is not happening :skull:

There was this: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/surface-commander-job-additions.33212/post-241800 But looking at it closer, even though that was sort of asking for the same thing for DoEA, I don't think the denial covered this specific case. +Support

Tried following this guide as 096 and got a FailRP warn 😭 /s

My nuclear take here is to allow bhopping, but only around Easter

This kind of thing has been denied numerous times in the past because of role bloat and extra annoyance on the part of Platform Team for having to deal with the bajillion roles that are on the Discord. I do kinda wonder that, since we have donation roles as a thing, if it was viable to do...

...Eh? That doesn't really line up with what I've been seeing lately. I've done numerous breaches as 096 on both US and UK, multiple of which have been as part of being freed by other breaches - And to my observation, breaches lately of all kinds have been handled very well. The worst I've seen...

Take into account that because of daily resets, there can only be so long that one person can be on the server at a time. This idea would work for some SCPs, but not others (i.e. might be useful for 049's cane, but only circumstantially) - The time-accrued buffs should be flexible and useful in...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Create a system that provides gradual buffs per SCP, proportional to the time that player spent in the Breach Queue, which would reset if the player either flags off the SCP, or when they're breached/recontained. To facilitate this in a reasonably...

"So you're not a DC? Prove it by retrieving something from your stash" Points at nearby stash with gun out ...Yes, this specific interaction is explicitly against the rules, but the existence of mods and the ticket system won't prevent all instances from occurring. I'm not confident that this...