Search results

+Major Support There are several entries in SCP test logs that convey the premise of the turnkey "not catching" and 914 just straight up declining to begin the process under certain conditions (albeit arbitrary, as is usually the case with 914). I think that if possible, something like that...

Hmm. This implementation specifically is kind of a non-starter. I agree the problems you raise need some kind of counterplay that incentivises arrest RP and such, but this is just too much. There's a better solution here. ==No Vote

-Support Former E-11 CPT here, even though I never knew old HCZ, IMO new HCZ, even if difficult to learn, kinda sticks in your head once you learn it. I agree that there are significant optimisations that can be made with improving things like objectives, RP density and quality of combat...

No dice

Quote boxes are screwed for me, they only show a little bit of what you wrote without the expand toggle.

There's no need for this. The primary thing looked at when approving PACs is whether or not it fits the server. If inappropriate PACs are being approved, then that's a problem for Staff to go over internally and smooth over problems with the approval process to make it more robust. A rule...

Why not instead ask to change the dimensions of the length, width and height of the radios, rather than their level of loudness? I think that kind of volume control would be useful.

I also think there should be more surface per surface.

How to 096 target

Isn't this planned?

I think there should also be more surface per surface.

What maniac is going to come on just after restart, get a raid authed so they can go set up a few random remote hacks, and then wait like 8 or 10 hours to trigger the stored hacks? Anyway, how is this going to work with SCP hacks where the hack is only valid when someone's flagged onto the SCP...

How delightfully innocent of you. ...Unless this was on purpose?

Aren't the vehicles just one big entity? Not entirely sure this is possible, but +Support if it is

And thus, CI backspawning sit rates rose by about 50% I'd be more in favour of this if instances of backspawning weren't apparently really hard to prove - If there was a better way to get more clear evidence of whether or not backspawning occurred, I'd fully back this. But ATM, what I see here...

+/- Neutral, leaning +Support On one hand, scrap hogging annoyances and unfriendliness to new players - On the other hand, D-Class gameplay balance. There's probably a better solution to this problem like adjusting the cooldown in some way, maybe something like having it change proportional to...

>Be chef >Be given CL3 by Site Admin >ISD see me with CL3 keycard and instantly arrest me for possessing it as to them, I am supposed to be a CL1 This is a good, engaging and fun RP loop and I would like to encourage more of it. +Support

+Support I like the cut of your jib.

Does MC&D still share a colour with O5/EC jobs? I forget

...I'm confused. Can't they already do this?