Search results

Okay How come both of you appeal at the same time and are detected as alts? Why wasn't an appeal made earlier by your friend, as it has been 11 months since his ban for alt detection?

hey @Ricky , What's your relation with the following account? https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561199244747487/

hey @TheJipSquad , What's your relation with the following account? https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198057893763/

The issue is that the original content isn't from the same addon/modelpack. And you can't just straight copy the bodygroup or skin texture. You will need to edit every single one or make one from scratch. I personally have looked into this and it is a pain to make fit and match on female...

Other/Miscellaneous Hi @soren moyai , This is something that can be dealt with in-character and doesn't need content approval. Suggestions are for new additions or changes to server features, rules/systems. Contact your Site administration or Chief of Security if you would like to...

Hey @Glazzing , Im going to deny this request based on our guidelines for them. - It needs to be made within 24 hours. It appears that this is more of a complaint to remove an old warning or change a verdict made weeks ago. For that, you will need to file a complaint agaisnt the staff...

hey @'Glue' Is there any evidence of this situation you are describing? Best regards, Holland

OH YES NOW I CAN PUSH CI THEY DONT HAVE A TB HOLDING THE LONG HALLWAY WITH HIS AMAZING POWERS, Accepted, thank you for bringing it up. I wasn't aware it did this for players in console. We staff get a pop-up.

already on the works

Removed after Rule breaks on the role

VERDICT Let me start with the main issue here that was presented, Metagaming: There isn't sufficient proof of metagaming going on. The argument that was made regarding community supervisor bear being present within the call doesnt valide any prior/later metagaming within the channel. If a...

Made notes and went over all of the comments. im awaiting a response from x players involded that received a DM from me, A verdict will be posted once I receive all the information I requested.

Locked until reviewed

@dara @Sammy Peppers @jimmy'cook'dibble @tadtad31 You have 48 hours to explain your side of the story. otherwise a verdict will be rendered without your side being considerd/ taking into the verdict. please keep it to 1 post

possible but a waste of time, honestly, you also remove RP potential,

hey @Garry man After speaking with the staff member involved and looking into your history, i find it hard to believe you aren't aware of our basic rules and that they are always enforced. The situation, how it was explained makes me believe you are just here to mess around and ruin...

ofcourse the above is if other content and Supers agree with my suggestion.

hmmm im thinking of a feature that can solve this issue in the most IC way, How about trying to see if i can extend the Comms blacklisted feature from Sitecommand to like SA+ and maybe directors? Might need some changes within the system but it would resolve most of this in a IC way.

Suggestion Denied Hello @Crabbergames, We currently have rules in place to limit SCP-912's ability to interrupt D-class personnel during a triot. SCP-912 is only allowed in D-block during a code 2, and we believe that adding more restrictions would not benefit the role. Regarding in-character...

Suggestion Denied, Hey @AstroHyena Thanks for making a suggestion. After long discussions and after multiple SCP breach changes, we concluded that this is for now not needed, although we might reconsider this in the future if this issue persists over time. Best regards, Content team