Search results

I thought this was how it worked in the first place 😭You're telling me I've been throwing money away? I've probably tossed about 50k's worth into the void for kicks Auburn refund me pls

+Support However, I have one issue - You state And while this does come across as an overall E&TS rework, the prop placer idea feels very odd-one-out. I don't see how something like that is not separate and intrinsically unlinkable from everything else here.

+Major Support I acknowledge the concerns previously raised, but ultimately believe that the fun potential outweighs the abuse potential. We now have warfunds implemented as we kept wanting - And one of the big reasons given in the past as to why we couldn't have warfunds, was that they needed...

Definitely, we should remove 012 because a D-Class resisted testing for me once, citing that I was just "taking them to a gas chamber" 👽 But also, I feel like if you gave the community the choice between removing 860 and removing 012, they'd pick 012.

Oh. This is the exact same model that was suggested before and denied :skull:For some reason, I didn't recognise it because of the pic's filter I feel like you're going to get the same reasoning:

+Major Support Excellent. I remember seeing a suggestion from Marin that linked a workshop link, but was apparently unworkable due to it not being optimisable enough to reasonably fit on the server. I think this is a suitable and needed replacement for the current model. If at all possible, it...

+Support

I would also like to add that an SCP being able to breach doesn't make it purely a non-RP SCP - Some good examples of roleplay-heavy breaching SCPs (without including 912 as it's a freeroam SCP anyway) IMO are 035, 049, 096, 7722 and 8837. I think that being able to breach as an incentive for...

+Support My entire tenure as GM was slop events, that is absolutely not a reason to BL :skull:

+Support Yeah, this functionality is pretty much just a leftover from base DarkRP systems, but honestly we don't need it - There's no reason for players to know this (aside from knowing whether or not a TB slot is open, but they can just check in F4 - IMO, D-Class should be able to sign-up for...

What the fluoride?

Currently, 096 pics can also spawn at complete random, and they don't require anyone to be flagged onto 096. There's also some bug with 096 where if someone finds and destroys one without an 096 flagged, then it causes some issue when 096 flags on after the pic gets destroyed? I guess I can see...

+Support Pretty sure Yeke directly stated along the effects of investigating this. There doesn't seem to be a ticket for it though and idk how useful that'd be, given the way development works, how crucial this is and that this may be something Yeke (or Auburn, whoever) ends up doing themself.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Reintroduce the dispenser behaviour in which it had a small chance to produce an 096 picture when hacked - With regards to concerns over it being too annoying, or too powerful for CI, investigate either of the following possibilities: Making it...

Sure. I've done it a few times, myself.

Could just update and change the suggestion entirely with what you want changed.

what is the visibility level of shadow dimension is it not literally just shadows on the floor

No way

Yeah, that's the thing I linked - I don't think it was abandoned, so much as it's in development hell. I imagine there's lots of issues with trying to actually implement it, given what it is; And especially now that we have to be more frugal with giving SWEPs out.

The reasoning they give for not letting everyone just spawn with bodycams is something along the lines of allowing ISD to have more investigative roleplay rather than just their loop always being reviewing a clip and being done with it - The main problem being is that this pretty much never...