Search results

You dont get rights buddy! ur very funny

As its not a whitelisted role like Sr agent and above it will cause more issues than what we got now. Thats just my opinion as all mtf are whitelisted and in the current rule there is an exepction where 2 DEA CL4 can be counted as MTF as they are also whitelisted.

I like those ideas more than mine honestly! Maybe i will change it for 4 SOP. That would make more sense. And change the current rule of 2 DEA CL4 to AO or something close. But i dont think DEA agents should count.

I really wanted to remove that part but i cant come with an idea to fix the AFK issue but what Emilia said can be not a very bad solution which is the AFK tag like admins have.

It seems this will make more problems for US than it will fix UK. I may just delete the post and try to get it more detailed to ensure UK and US health.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion changes the current raid rules by requiring a minimum of 6 active MTF to be online in order for the CI to raid. OR removing the DEA CL4 alternative from rules Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

The problem i have is that to pull the vehicle repair tool there is a cooldown and then you can switch which isnt on other jobs or on the tool gun

I just tried no it doesnt.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: After throwing a grenade, you will automatically switch to the vehicle repair tool. Which is kind of annoying i noticed this on the Nu-7 specialist job as it have the repair tool which when you throw a grenade it will change automaticly to the vehicle...

+Support So true

+support great guy should also get SCP-001 whitelist!

If you have read the changelog you would have noticed its for CSG for Nu7, delta for CI and 1SGT for GOC. But sure i will add it to the suggestion as i replied above that i didnt explain who can use them currently.

Like i need chief overseer to spawn ammo crate what...

That’s fine since the one people able to use warfunds are CSG+. I think most of these downvotes are from people who don’t fully understand how warfunds currently work, which I suppose is partly my fault maybe I should have made it clearer that CSG+ are the only ones who can currently use them...

its for CSG+ I dont see issues with that?

From what I know SA and SC jobs being highest on site needs to approve it, which I personally find a bit annoying.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion proposes that only the highest-ranking Nu-7 member present be authorized to approve the usage of war funds. Approval authority would be removed from Site Administration (SA) and Site Command (SC) personnel, requiring requests to first...

+support i have never had a bad interaction with

+support i believe he can do great things

+Support A leader who is always ready to guide and support newer members, actively helping those around him improve. His consistent dedication and ability to elevate others make him, in my opinion, an ideal candidate for SA.