+Support
alright well I would like to keep this a more straight to the point. I’ve seen you grow a lot from investigator where you were dedicated to getting the inspector position which you eventually did with no complaints from anyone in leadership. Then you went on to become a commissioner and...
+/- Support
Trust me I want to be in support because I know your the only one who knows what the director of isd needs to know. I also understand though you might not be the best for the position overall. Firstly you haven’t done a lot in your time as commissioner. It seems as though the...
I understand the limit on non combatives but why was making ISD have less armor apart of that? I mean I get ISD shouldn’t be the group of people in every combat situation but they still have a separate duty which is usually protecting noncombatives during codes.
Ok fine I’ll give my serious response
I think a major factor is people in higher positions( mainly cl4 but in some cases cl3 roles also ) have a lot more RP than low clearance levels. Speaking from a ISD leadership standpoint on USA I’ve been monitoring ETS and I’m not liking what I see. ETS...
Hello I'm gonna be pretty blunt here -Support and here is why.
Throughout my time as inspector I have seen nook do some questionable things. Generally relating to interactions with lower level personnel. I will be giving a example of one occasion which I got DMs about when I wasn't even on ISD...
+Support
Cedric has done a lot for isd, I like to consider him terry 2.0 as he has made effort to change many things. He joined ISD around the time of my ISD lock in where I stopped doing dumb stuff(for the most part 😭) and he was already a great member of ISD. He has always been very active...
ISD is currently combative but here’s the thing, isd isn’t the same kind of combative as say SOP which like raids ci and all that.
Regardless of that ISD deals with different things of combat (techie cartels shooting at us) which require us to have more body armor and for some reason content...
This is already unauthorized treason if it’s giving it to a ci or something but here’s my solution:
Allow departments to toggle who sees the frequency to like just cl4 members
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.