Search results

+Support, If they didn't want to go for the easy way out or to not buff him too much another easy solution would to make there be multiple SCP-966 specimens that could breach at once.

Adding to this: The main idea behind this super duper simple 173 pac was to test the waters for the idea of a ruined 173 of sorts, due to either the multitude of tests, a prior chaos raid or even just general withering. I was inspired by the idea of a more realistic 173 model.

PAC Requesting Approval PAC Requested (Which job): SCP-173 Steam ID: 76561198845292011 Hello, this is my first Pac3, It's quite the unorthodox one too. The reason for this Pac3's lack of features is due to the fact that when I have asked in-game moderators their opinions on this 173 specific...

What does this suggestion add: Adds visible ability cooldowns for SCP-079 players when hovering over potential hacks, I.E: Lockdown (Cooldown - 30 seconds remaining) (Additionally): Adds the ability for SCP-079 to access how many SCPs are breached/can actually breach [Scales with Server Pop]...

Thanks Bro.

Rant: Alright I'm just going to put it out here, 079's new rework is hella buggy, It's a fun rework that is something I'm sure everyone can vouch for but his new kit is so buggy. From bugged breach queues to having to resort to typing 'record 1;stop' every time his ui breaks it's clear he has a...

+SUPPORT PLEASE LET HIM BE BUFFED SL.

I enjoy some of these ideas, however for the 5 minute silent breach status on the breach status machine might I suggest it be base-kit for the first 5-10 minutes of one of 079's breaches. I've had breaches as 079 last less than 3 minutes due to e-11 and other MTF sweeping HCZ for samples when...

Oh alright, thanks for this, Seems kind of annoying though, but I could see how it would just be exploited if it was dropped in like say D-block pit.

Has anybody else noticed that when you breach as 096 via a photo being spawned, the moment you are bucketed your photo de-spawns in the hud ui up top? Genuinely curious if any developers or SL could explain to me if this is intentional or not, I cant see why it would be and I am leaning more so...

+support, Hope this comes in with the upcoming breach queue rework.

+support

What does this suggestion change add: Add's the ability for SCP-079 to utilise the announcement system for cognitohazardous purposes. I.E: high cost + CD Ability to activate a room's speakers for the specific purpose of playing said cognitohazard, similar to the SCPI-NeT cognitohazard ability it...

+Support

-support I agree with the annoyance of low pop breaches but it needs a little more thought put into it, rather then just remove D class hacking at low pop make it an equal solution I.E: When 5+ MTF/GSD are online and 5 D class are online they are able to breach SCP's. D-Class is honestly very...

Oh shoot, mb, dunno how to remove this post so I'll just mark the title as (ignore)

+Support This is a great suggestion, it's healthy for SCP players and while yes the odd e-11 will complain even some MTF I have talked to agree it's too easy to contain a 79 before he can even begin to do damage, might I add a suggestion of a rule change as well where SCP's can actually camp...

+support this ^

+support

What does this suggestion change? fixes the addition of the 3 cost cognito ability to allow it to actually be lethal for humans watching. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different? N/A Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2) -Useful ability...