Search results

because half the rules uk makes are stupid and the other half are SL rulings that make no sense UK like their serious role player while US likes combat. i mean good luck trying to remove all the us staff players for not enforce stupid ass rules yall make

Its enough where i can easily call you out at a decent distances

They got rid of the total invisibility because CI would use it to get into hcz without issues and no one would call out doors magically opening and so foundation would cry to NL like they always do. +support make shadow dimension great again

lol good luck enforcing this, guaranteed no one will follow this or make loopholes to ignore it.

nu7 wouldn't be able to handle this even if they make the tank more weaker

wouldn't be surprise for site 9 to fall unless they bring some sort of uniqueness in the game.

Would they revert scp hack difficult to their original settings if there was one entrance, since it would make even more easier to defend hcz now there is only one way to get in and there would be no excuse e11 to fail defend HCZ long enough or kick rocks?

I only see CI doing passive RP if you remove the entire co-team and bring in LARPers that enforce RP over combat, which will either kill CI or eventually the co-team folds and bring in a pro-combat player in the CI co-team, and we're back to square one or restricting CI, which could long-term...

+support Makes 682 somewhat useful again

if this get accept nu7 jugg needs to be nerf down a bit to bring balance makes no sense in balance to give the team that has superior numbers better weapon while the opponent has limit number and a weaker weapon

So I'm thinking in character, how does someone's items that are in hcz stash get to garage stash without destroying half of the interior structure of the site, half of the items are too big to even fit in the stash, and/or too dangerous to be moved without being damaged or damaging the things...

I don't know why you put common sense into this. If common sense were applied, there would only be one stash in each faction.

i would be fine with this if it lowered the hacking level when we fuck with specific electrical boxes since that is a instant call out to disable cctv and everyone start steam rolling into hcz -support unless they make it where we can silently disable power boxes or weaken hacking level

what a douchebag i get it if the person had their hacks visible while recording and the staff member saw it because i seen it happened before, but for petty shit like behopping that dude clearly hates you and you should be careful about those types of people

Foundation buffs because they have multiple stashes in different locations, giving them an upper hand in combat if this was accepted. DC may forget something in their stash, and accepting this would be a nerf on DC in general. So, if you think it's not OOC, then let's just have one stash in...

foundation buff would also ruin dc I also consider stash as an ooc thing because you can access them anywhere in the server -support

It depends on the suggestion, like a gun change, a rule change, or something significant that can change how the branch works telling the CO team what suggestion you are making can give the CO the ability to express their opinion about the suggestion you are making, sometimes positive, sometimes...

-support This would just reward players to afk anywhere and would encourage complacency We shouldn't be rewarding player that don't afk in bunks If you don't want to be kidnap go to bunks, otherwise this just seems like a cope suggestion.

Let's say you had a wife, were in bed, and woke up to see her staring at you with no emotion. You ask her: What's up She then walks to the living room while you're following her After you say: What the hell is going on your wife goes into the darkest corner in the room and starts speaking Latin...