Search results

Suggestion Approved Hi @saskyc , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Denied Hi @Smity_Boi , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reasons: We as content feel 079 is a support scp and that this ability would be too strong for 079 to have. Furthermore...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Kito , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reason: We as content feel that this is a not needed change, as this would be used mostly used in Player Vs Player...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Sayo , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reason: We as content feel that this is not needed, and when you get arrested you should carry out your sentence and think...

Suggestion Denied Hi @McMuffin , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reason: We as content do not want to buff Enforcements too much to the point that it would make them mini juggernauts. We...

Suggestion Denied Hi @L.Saint , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reasons: We as content feel that GOC does not need theses indirect buffs and that most of the jobs are in a good spot as it...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Dusk , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reason: We as content feel this is not neccessary as research is in a good spot progression wise and it doesn't need to be...

Suggestion Denied Hi @Kito , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reasons: We as content believe this is completely unness unnecessary as it is an indirect buff to GOC by asking to swap the...

Suggestion Approved Hi @Flare , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @Arion , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. We like the suggestion as we like the idea of allowing Containment Units to spawn closer to the scps breached, however it may not be possible due to technical limitations at the moment Your suggestion...

Suggestion Approved Hi @Nosey | Curious , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @Ducko , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @XTS, Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @Recker , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @"Apollo" , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

Suggestion Approved Hi @Niox , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.

+ / - Support - I know your active withing GSD - But from what ive seen recently I dont think your ready for a Sr CL4 role. I think you should work on proffessionalism on the server and then apply

+ support Drunkest CO (Major W)

Suggestion Denied Hi @Dopamine , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons. Reason: We believe that this overhauls 079 in ways we do not want. Furthermore, we feel that this would push 079 towards...

Suggestion Up For Further Discussion Hi @Remmy , Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. The Content Team has chosen to put your suggestion up for internal discussion. Reason: This has been sent to Network Leadership for pending review, hopefully it gets looked at soon...