Search results

i just found it funny lol, i've edited my post to say why i -supported it

-support, there's so many guns already - metas mean most people will probably stick to a very small selection of guns so more weapons would either change the meta until a nerf happens or just add to the increased pool of underused weapons also:

-support least obvious rage suggestion

+support PLEASEE

+support, this is all i need to hear fr tho this would be very cool if they actually had a mobile fucking TANK only issue is it would only really be useful on surface - might be another reason for people to join GOC tho (or for GMs to use), iirc there is already a mech ragdoll in server files...

you wrote scp 2599⁉️⁉️

-support Mr Deeds, activate the Alpha Warhead

-support for reasons already stated

+support good suggestion

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: If code restrictions can't stop it, make as many unique server-keybinds as possible configurable (e.g. so you don't need to press G specifically to perform X action) Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...

+support it's really unfun to use codewords to catch intruders especially since there's no way to counter it - even if you successfully use a codeword you'll be metagamed and brought to a sit where they'll ask how you know the codeword. Requirements of a code sheet to be printable, hackable, or...

+support radios are so useful especially as a D-class escapee who wants to coordinate things 😍😍😍 in those scenarios i'd always just contact a GM and say smth like: "I escaped the facility and have met with CI/GOC/whoever, in this case it'd be resonable that if I asked them for a radio that...

^^^ this is a very good point, this would only be useful in such a specific scenario so you gotta ask is it worth all the extra hassle that'd come from adding it as a rule?

+support ERT turrets should definitely still be able to target him (ERT are meant to be OP by design) I also think it'd be very cool if facility blackouts were manually done to help fight a 966 breach as it'd make containing him much more unique and a bigger priority (kill 966 fast so you can...

+support they literally had keypads in his cell so people could do this b4 unless you join a MTF or CI you can't practice conveniently any other way

overall +-neutral but leaning to +support you absolutely cooked on the scp reworks although quite a few of them would be impossibly difficult to code i imagine 7722 rework, as cool as it is, just seems like a recycled version of 096 and no info is given on how you'd figure out who is "evil" and...

my bad man i didn't consider anything about international pages 👍👍👍 thanks for clarifying what you meant, if i'm not misunderstanding you i think we're both in agreement in what we want coming out of CI?

+support entirely makes sense unless there is a method implemented to change the name on a keycard any card you get will have another person on the map with the same name in the past it's always been a grey area- in my experience some mods will say "only someone who, IC, would know who that...