Search results

-support for all reasons listed here (including ohio suggestion) a fix for this problem is coming soon, not allowing people to express their opinions on a current situation will stop people from getting any good feedback (e.g. if i see loads of people complaining that i'm doing a shit event...

ci-wiki.wikidot.com user detected 🤮🤮🤮 using shit from ci-wiki.wikidot.com is like going to poundland and expecting the same quality of products as going to M&S On the 'CI wiki' there are 80 articles written collectively by 20 people, and of those 20 people 2 PEOPLE HAVE WRITTEN HALF THE ARTICLES...

final solution to the CI problem 🤯🤯 the way you describe CI is exactly how i wish it would be (an organisation full of deep covers who pretend to work in the foundation, and rare facility raids) but you definitely knew as you were writing this that what you're hoping for is utterly unachievable...

+support

-support never make a suggestion again if you are suggesting to nerf d-class scout

+-neutral I second what @YandereMuffin said tbh During a breach the feature can be really useful. Considering the time it takes an SCP to destroy a bulkhead I think it should take an equal amount of time for a techie to repair it, if not even slower. Maybe also implement a feature that stops...

> rural canadian area > naturally suggests mosins and karabiners

+support/+-neutral > "the system is convoluted and needs to be reworked!" > suggests convoluted system you raise some good points about the current system requiring a 'master of one zone' having to oversee all other zones even if their experience doesn't cover it, but i think another big system...

make a suggestion that does exactly what this suggestion does only at low pop when it actually makes sense to do this 🤯🤯

-support once every hour an A-1 makes himself a freedom and nobody else can do it- get good at guarding 914 and your problem is solved‼️‼️

D-Class Helicopter 🤯🤯

YES YES I AFFIRM!!!! 🐉🤑🐉🤑🤑🏮🐉🏮🐉⛩️

+support iirc there is a MASSIVE GAP between pinewood and the SCP facility itself where something could be placed, I think some Site 65 styled corridors/ rough recreations of different sections all pieced together or something alongside objective rooms (SCP 'chambers', 'offices', etc...) would...

+support purely because of the map change which was so unexpected it's good 😭 event #1 seems easy to run and could be interesting events #2 and #3 are interesting ideas but in practice would be incredibly difficult to run (a massive ball around pinewood is a lot easier said than done and would...

+support to everything EXCEPT THIS: it allows for some fun scenarios when you have a CL5 card: you can, for example, claim to be an O5 member to some CL2 person whilst disguised and they would have no reason not to believe you or read up on SCP documentation just because it isn't as useful as...

forums goat emilia :freeze::freeze:

"Different type of weapon" is either intentionally vague or does not apply to what I'm saying (which is the specific case of changing the material textures of the weapon which appears on your screen as part of your VIEWMODEL that nobody else on the server can see) unless this rule can somehow...

how is it pac abuse to change the viewmodel skin of your weapon? how is ANYBODY going to see that your pac is changing your viewmodel's weapon skin? as far as i know this is not possible so even if it was pac abuse nobody could even know

-support you can literally do this with pac3 already