Search results

I dont like the name, too long. Aside from that, i see no other viable candidate

-Support As a first matter, which is mostly just preference. I prefer when the upper echelons of Site Command are staffed by non-staff, and more importantly non-gms, though I certainly understand the reasons for preferring otherwise. I think you promise too much. Especially fixing complex...

+Support I like this application, the lore is short but well formatted and does what it sets out to do, i dont think it really establishes much of an Idea as for what he might do in the future though, on a bigger scale aside from being a "traditional" foundation man.

-Support Not personally fond of the lore within the application.

I personally do not think every detail and inconsistency within the server needs to be, or even should be, explained. This nebulous vague area of "Why did they build this horribly unsafe site" leaves lots of open room as to potential answers "Its not real" or "Site-19 exploded" etc are all...

-Support At the current time I do not feel as though I can support your return to the GM team, with my main concerns being the increased need for indipendant work, and past conduct.

-Support Hello Rito, as of current, this application does not do much of anything to distinguish itself from most other applications, with very few original ideas and concepts that appear in just about every other application verbatim and a handfull of hard-to-implement ones, I remain...

-Support Hello Gregory, Thank you for taking the time to write an application. At this current time, I will not be Supporting your Application. Starting with the Map Change event, while I do not belive it reasonable to expect new applicants to come up with a Sensible proposal, it still serves...

-Support Hello Jax, I was not particularilly interested by the ideas presented in your application. Furthermore, you seem to have misunderstood the "example mission" part of the application, as these do not directly refer to the map change event, this is understandable as the wording on the...

-Support A very Surface level application that does not betray a notable understanding of the SCP writing universe nor particulary capabilities in the term of writing and event-hosting. A large problem is how a lot of the ideas rely largely on the name power of what they are about, "Someone who...

-Support Overall not a very good application that leaves much to be desired.

On Second thought, i have changed my mind and want Site Command removed as soon as possible. +Support

Im going to day 50 you

+Support A very experienced GM, one of the best builders i have ever seen, applying with a very well formatted and hard to criticise application. I can think of a few nitpicks, but the complete package of this app is excellent, and id be very happy to be able to work with you again. I can...

The state of roleplay does not hinge on any one thing, many suggestions are made with the sentiment of "this will fix RP!!!!" but even when approved, things remain mostly the same. In my eyes, this suggestion fixes one problem and creates 3 new ones. Now im not saying it shouldnt be done because...

-Support I am personally of the belief that the tone and Style of this PAC3 is unfitting and unsuitable for the RP environment of the server in a way that would diminish the overall experience. Many people would cite "Cain Pathos Crow" as a very popular and accepted demihuman in SCP "lore"...

A very interesting read full of many interesting ideas that im very lucky to have been able to help along to completion, if i had not known better, i would have belived Washingtwon to be a real enclave mentioned in tales.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This Suggestion would have the ADB removed from SCP-22415-3 Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Not to my knowledge. Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): -Incentivising Diplomacy with...

Im telling Duke.

-1000000 Social Credit Smh, cant belive you would spread this propaganda