Search results

+Support But it'll be denied cuz it doesn't make money and its content for GOIs and not exclusively Foundation or premium content. Lol

Is there anywhere specific we can post our comments? or just here? Cuz I think yall need to delete snipers or add ceramic plates as something people can get, either from AA or from warfunds.

delete them????? wont balance them with ceramic plates or any other feature thats already made on milRP on god

I'm not going to debate with you further since you are just ignoring each and every statementjust to make it seem as though a rule suggestion that simulates RP does the opposite and 'nullifies' the CoC/CoE by existing, which is just ridiculous. If you can't understand that the RP scenario ends...

The entire purpose of this rule clarification would not outright prevent Civs from being killed, but would specify unarmed, non-hostile civs are not to be KOS'd until an appropriate RP reason presents itself. The Foundation DOES protect civilians, hence the name Secure. Contain. Protect...

Cope. Honestly a krill issue. GOC is like 80% worse then CI and 50% worse then Foundation. We get airstrikes & shitter weapons then CI do. Teaming with CI is RP related, and can easily flip to complete hostilities / war, same as Foundation. DEA / Nu7 get better versions of our classes...

+Support Please god. Remove the rank / prefix for Assessment Teams and Deep Covers, its so obvious and easy to meta game with. All someone has to do is look at your name and ask for an ID or code-word check you and its jover.

+Support Polish fr

So the issue currently, and prior, is that Parawatch are discouraged from RPing as SOP doesnt really do much on surface, and as a result getting a valid RP reason to enter the site is very difficult. This leads to people simply breaking rules to have a little fun as parawatch or similar. Though...

The few times Ive tried conducting actual parawatch RP, with documents, conspiracy development, etc., all ended when I entered the site and got spotted by any MTF personnel, in which I am immediately killed. Ive been interrogated a whopping one time, and it was conducted so poorly I can...

As I stated in my suggestion, this rule would not apply to civilians with guns drawn, either on safety or aimed. Most of your points seem to come from an agitated state, which I dont blame you for, but generally speaking this rule would encourage more genuine, active roleplay from both sides...

The entire purpose of the Foundation is to protect civilians, and your character, even in the Foundation, shouldnt be willingly killing civilians on-sight just because its a classified area. If someone is obviously failRPing, that doesn't make this rule any more or less valid, nor does it...

Civilians who are wielding guns would be exempt from this rule as they are intentionally being combative; Additionally, the only near-pear equipment that can be acquired by any allowed surface job to enter site is that of MC&D, who is incapable of selling said equipment to Rangers or Parawatch...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Clarifies that Foundation and Global Occult Coalition personnel may not immediately kill Civilians within their base that aren't breaking rules(such as Parawatch entering Site-65), unless the individual is armed, hacking, or otherwise posing a threat...

Dog. You don't want the Kriss. It physically cannot kill someone in one mag, even if you land all your shots, it only downs them.

Been in the backlog for a year. Its March of 2024, the original was March of 2023 Not trying to be rude but if it hasn't been made in a year it probably wont get made

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Adds a few GOC formats similar to the Foundation's, those being: GOC Incident Report GOC Research Study GOC Report Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Yes, it can be found HERE, and was accepted...

PLEASE. Ill only +Support of other factions get thermals as well; CI and F should get drone thermals and GOC should get worn thermals, since CI and F get better / more snipers

+Support :3

+Support. There needs to be a trade off during a Code-2 for GSD. Theres no reason to not call it whenever you see a few D-Class with knives or guns. Overall I think its a bit too agressive with the D-Class changes, but the GSD changes are very nice. SRU was a role that was a wild-card by...