Search results

🇿🇼

It's also worth noting that community popularity does not necessarily dictate suggestion results. Case in point, the remove SC & AO suggestions - Massively popular with the community, but rejected.

+/- Neutral I agree with the general consensus that the breach queue pausing is a general good thing for server health - Although as an 096 main myself, I also understand the frustration with waiting for breaches. I would argue that if any change should be made, then maybe it could only pause...

+Support to an extent What people don't realise is that the newer crowds are somewhat averse to doing things like making forum accounts and such, with good reason, honestly - Honestly, if applications need to continue existing, they need to be accessible from in-game. But I do also think that...

+Support But just let everyone page everyone else. If people fuck around with it, let ISD handle it (or COs in the case of CI/GOC).

Using combat chems should have some kind of drawback like added recoil

Counterpoint: Rewrite armouries to let us store these captured weapons in. Basically, the standard armoury stuff you can get right now (goggles, scarmbles, the current weapons in them) would have unlimited stock - Then weapons you capture from enemies, you can add to the armoury, and each...

I don't think this needs to be a physical thing in the server - More so just a part of the F4 menu somewhere. I know you're not strictly asking for an actual physical booth to be placed in the map, but I feel like that's how this might be taken. You may want to reword it a little so that it's...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: In-game, there's a flag for preventing corpses to be defibbed - The suggestion asks for this to be applied to the 096 SWEP, so that victims of 096 can't be brought back. OR Reapply 096 target on defibbed 096 victums. Has something similar been...

...You make it sound like a team deathmatch server Honestly, it's far from an ideal balance, but not that bad

+Major Support If at all possible. This would also greatly help with situations where someone could ungag a hostage when they're not supposed to and they use the window to cyanide - That way in cases where there are a lot of people around the hostage, you can easily figure out who did it. This...

+Support Looks good, I like the general principles here. It seems sensible to isolate 682 from the other SCPs in terms of breaches and then buff it.

This is probably another reason why this may be denied - The possibility of CI essentially getting two reality benders + a Jugg in a raid team. Granted, the SCP teaming rule already exists and applies to surface SCPs - And would apply to this too, but I think the potential for abuse in this...

Yes - This is the natural outcome of the kind of community that CN is, sporadic bursts of fun, creative storytelling & gameplay that are a byproduct of the fact that this is intrinsically an amorphous place; People can show up and if they're interested, start contributing their own ideas and...

The famously infinitely staffed Civil Networks Staff team, which can reasonably sprout and sustain many teams for every little possible niche. Additionally, having an entire team oversee things like story and plot typically hampers creativity rather then fostering it. A lot of this just doesn't...

Humans refuted is always good And a good number for your flying surface SCP could be 15160 (Just F16 as in the fighter jet, where F = 15 in hexadecimal and then a 0 slapped on the end to prevent confusion with a wiki SCP) Anyway, Knock, knock...

+Support Although could probably be denied for not wanting to encourage gang mentalities in D-Block; Since even though that makes sense for... A literal death-row inmate holding facility, this is also literally the intended place for server newcomers, and would make a pretty unwelcoming...

+Support

I'd be okay with 076 getting throwing knives, although I feel like it might make his gameplay a little too similar to 7722.

Oh right, this was written badly, I think. I feel like it's not within the spirit of the server(s) to prevent someone from holding SCP WLs on both. That's clearly how it's read, but I took the whitelisted portion of that as things like the Jr. CL4 roles, OSA, DEA, etc. You know,. important RP...