Search results

+Support Sounds good. Real talk, I think the Flare Gun should set fire to people you shoot it with, TF2 style. Maybe like 5 or 7 seconds of ignite?

Oop, I somehow misread the 3 as a 9. Reading closer, it makes more sense now. I was going to ask when 079 had any kind of reflect capability 🤪 In which case - Honestly... We literally can't. 073's damage reflection was taken away because people abused it. Then 073's collision was taken away...

079 is already whitelisted by virtue of requiring XK-VIP

Clearly rule parity doesn't work

-Support But I love jumping into the D-Block pit! :(

-Support 035 is considered one of the strongest SCPs by virtue of its flexibility, ability to use a hack tool and such. 035's strength isn't in itself, it's in how it enables other SCPs, similar to 079.

Yeah - For something like this specification of 'active,' I'd want a way to find out if people are AFK. If having an AFK badge appear on the leaderboard is undesired, maybe a command that just checks the number of applicable non-AFK roles and reports that back. That would also be good for...

Seconded, the concept is interesting. +Support

-Support Unnecessarily restrictive ruleplay

Honestly, this makes sense - Nu7 Officers also got it recently I believe, which leaves GOC having the only Surface-based CO that doesn't have a vehicle repair tool. Given that GOC are supposed to be the strongest of the three, this doesn't really make sense. +Support

...I feel like there needs to be a bigger community discussion on this as a whole, because as far as I can recall, this the first time I've seen such an emphatic community response to a suggestion of this nature - And thinking about that fact in tandem with the fact that people keep suggesting...

+Support Forced scarcity is not good if there's no real reason to pursue it, especially since surface scavenging is RNG-based.

Honestly, the only reason leaderboard info should ever be used in relation to disguise is in sits. Otherwise, the other person thinking you're disguised should not really be able to get any real info from the leaderboards - And instead find out properly IC.

I was going to say that ERT could just be added to E-11 and/or MTF groups, however that's metagamable by other factions, as they could flag onto Foundation roles, get ERT, see what the E-11/MTF frequency is, then use that knowledge on GOI factions And since this seems pretty difficult to...

Hmm. How about an armour threshold of 100, instead of 50? As in, max armour prevents/mitigates tranqing (at least, 100 is max for most jobs, this would just be stronger for juggs since IIRC they start with more?) It makes 0 sense that armour would be able to stop tranqs?

Very similar to this from last month: https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/966-rebalance.33167/ I don't think the opinion here will have changed. Compared to what I say in that thread though, mine kind of has? I'm actually okay with HP reduction to that HP range, if there are multiple...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion asks for tranquilisers to only take effect if the individual hit by them has 50 armour or less. Optionally also separate the tranq gun into two SWEPs, the "weaker tranq gun" that operates with the above behaviour under all conditions...

Feels like more of an event suggestion than a content suggestion.

So this is kinda minor QoL thing, but before the update, you could create a specific quote by highlighting a section of text in the post that you want to quote - Then a little 'reply' button would appear, you hit it and it creates a quote in your reply, with only what you highlighted. This...

Ah, that wasn't clear to me.