Search results

Hm. +Support

I get the intent, but this is... Way too much right now. You're effectively asking for full-on reworks of 5 separate-but-related systems and 2 new ones. Furthermore, I feel like even if this were implemented, this would exacerbate some extant unhealthy mentalities in the playerbase regarding...

😔 I get the reasoning - I think the biggest reason most people dislike moving away from the original 173 is that all the 'new takes' on it that I've seen like in SL and such, kinda try too hard to go into the 'creepy'/'horror' factors - But IMO, the original 173 has like a kinda "creepy-cute"...

Containment maintenance, my beloved I feel like this specifically would just result in more slop testing "RP" akin to how sampling is now - Making testing more of a chore than a medium.

UK Nu7 CPL here. On UK, Jugg is still not allowed in D-Block without a valid reason.

...Yeah. Alright. I feel like you should also be able to pop the queue by hacking a containment box - Hack box -> Hack successful -> Player at the front of queue is flagged onto that SCP -> Breach. That way, you could make asking in OOC for an SCP to flag on for breach against the rules and just...

Pleading with whoever ends up resolving this to go over community feedback and discourse without just writing it off as "The community don't want this," all because a few dozen people didn't read and just went "What the heck, all of Nu7 CL2? Bad, downthumbered." I hate this place 😭😭😭😭😭 People...

Let Julien cook.

:unsure: Hmm. +/- Neutral

I see both sides of this. I get the problem - To be honest, I did always find it weird that you can just instacuff people, but I get the reasoning. Regardless of all of this, I think a cooldown on using cuffs is necessary because being able to easily spam cuff two or three people in quick...

I like this idea, but if you do this as a change to the normal tranq, it could be considered a nerf to ISD when using tranqs to make arrests. I think this should be approached from two directions: The target - I don't think under any circumstances, F should be able to effectively use tranqs...

+Support

Paging @Niox One particular idea in terms of breach raid balancing that I've been mentally toying with, is the concept of quantifying 'new & returning players' for various gameplay changes - An issue with nerfing breaching SCPs in both the queue and in being hacked out, is that it heavily...

What if, instead of having these right off the bat, 457 progressively gains access to them as they ignite more players? Kinda similar to how 079's growth system works. That could be more balanced while also fitting how 457 works, since a part of the idea behind him is that he grows with the more...

Hello, this is a comprehensive guide on how to cure your hiccups. Thank you for reading.

As an 096 main, I fully get this frustration. I hate when this happens. Based ??? Yes. Okay. You can't just say 'perchance'. No. Even assuming that you're just referring to the site overall (Because if you mean the entire map, wtf are F going to do if the bucket spawns in CI or GOC base...

The enlisted should be honoured to share a clearance level with the almighty Tech Experts.

Makes sense, sure. +Support The map props can be removed and then GOC can work with GMs on how they want their base to be set up before getting the props permapropped by a Sr. Admin. Simple affair.

What about all the additional permaprops you'd be placing in place of the map props?

...Not only would this be job bloat, but to a degree, you've basically reinvented the PVT & SPC ranks (at least for these MTFs; Also applies to GOC to an extent, too?) in terms of purpose. If this was aimed at me, I'm just someone with a lot of opinions and passion who easily foams at the mouth...