Search results

Whoops, didn't see the 096 ticket that plans a solve for this already. 😵‍💫 Go ahead and close it I guess I could leave it up for the second feature, but it's not really that important and you'll say no anyway, so 🤷‍♀️ Good ticket though, covers every issue I have with 096 gameplay atm. Can't...

I understand your position here, but from what I'm seeing, this reads very much like a 'one bad apple spoiled the bunch' type situation. During my time in E-11, I distinctly recall numerous passive breaches occurring that were largely enjoyed by the rest of the site and created engaging RP in...

+Overwhelming Support Excellent idea. I have a knife skin that I would like to use in D-Block riots on rare occasion - And even though it doesn't particularly make much sense where D-Class would be getting fancy looking knives and such from, I believe the benefit to the server in encouraging...

To convey the sheer scope of something like this and make the as much of the problem as evident as I possibly can, in no uncertain terms. If I just wrote "Hi pls make 096 push aside ppl in its way, here's some clips that show that there are issues with current behaviour," it's more easily...

Fair

I agree. Thank you for putting it so saliently. There is no option to "leave the queue." If you flag on an SCP that is able to breach, the only ways to leave the queue are to be breached, or to flag off the SCP entirely. IMO this is a Content problem that would easily be solved by passive...

-Support >Be me, DEA agent that just flagged on >There is an ongoing discussion about the 008 zombie virus in MTF comms, something which IIRC, all MTFs know about >I have just been infoleaked to

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make the following changes to the 096 SWEP: Add a passive effect to 096 that, when enraged, forcibly pushes aside any non-targets who are in front of 096 as it runs into them My initial idea included a temporary ragdolling effect similar to how the...

+Support Excellent. Classic Dennid behaviour.

This makes sense, everyone knows Cadets don't have object permanence (y)

+Support for CI getting massive alarms in their base that go off when GOC use their warfunds.

"We want more RP over combat" also completely removes the opportunity for an SCP to make their natural breach passive. I would expect something like this to accompany the addition of a passive breach queue. This is massively counter-intuitive. I can only see these changes as just a straight...

Real talk, I don't think using the direct information of what Escape RIsk is passes as metagame - It's not non-diegetic information like name above the head, it is explicitly a separate model with the express purpose of highlighting "this is a more dangerous, higher security risk D-Class than...

It's not that it doesn't work, it's that people just straight up don't understand how it works. The implementation is probably the best that could reasonably done in the Source engine for a multiplayer framework? It's an interacting dilemma because the nature of it being buggy is both not...

In a FearRP sit with your idea implemented, how do you prove that the disguised D-Class was or wasn't an Escape Risk? This feels like a bit of an annoying hoop for Staff to jump through.

In my experience, GSD almost never detain escaped D-Class and elect instead to shoot them, so this changes nothing.

+Support Everyone else is overreacting. This makes perfect sense tbh. I always felt like FearRP for literal death-row inmates should be more of a case-by-case basis rather than alike the strict conditions applied to everyone else. Free my boys.

Ability to explode yourself and everyone around you, which in every circumstance, will always kill you and force you to respawn, which makes it relatively difficult to do a lot of mass killing without failraiding: :mad: 2-slot job that allows you to shoot literal explosives at groups of people...

Fair enough, didn't think of that. My intuition was that it'd come with a copy button, but it didn't occur to me that that wouldn't solve it. I'm kinda just throwing things out here, but how do you feel about mirrored name for the caller portion, then? Just make it more difficult to metagame at...

+Major Support Real talk, remove (/update) the mic question from everything but staff apps, too - Or even just some further clarification about it. I feel like that one confuses/turns away people the most - I've been both an OSA and a GM, both of which "required mic," but... Really don't, in my...