Search results

Hey there, sorry for the mix up but could you please further elaborate? My steam ID should be by default the 64ID version as per all others, it's the same ID used here. Just curious as I've never had to find any ID other then my 64ID version, thanks for your time.

Steam ID: 76561198845292011 Discord name: smityboi For how long have you played on CN SCP: Around 3 years, I joined the forums about almost a year-in (2 years in forums). Age: 19 In what country are you located?: Australia NSW Time zone: AEST Character name(s): 'Smelly' Dave Civilian name: David...

PAC Requesting Approval: PAC Requested (Which job): SCP-999 Steam ID: 76561198845292011 Photograph of PAC:

Thank you! Also do you know anything pertaining to attacking a target that shoots at you remains in spot and crouches as 939? Silly question I know but the rules are a little blurry around it, MTF tend to complain when it happens to them.

Does anybody know if SCP-939 has any other rules other then 'spamming'? because from what I can gather the Rule MOT menu does not state (any) 939 specific rules, I mean if they wanted to remove 'spamming' so be it that would be an easy fix just make the swep have a cd. But besides the point...

+Support, If they didn't want to go for the easy way out or to not buff him too much another easy solution would to make there be multiple SCP-966 specimens that could breach at once.

Adding to this: The main idea behind this super duper simple 173 pac was to test the waters for the idea of a ruined 173 of sorts, due to either the multitude of tests, a prior chaos raid or even just general withering. I was inspired by the idea of a more realistic 173 model.

PAC Requesting Approval PAC Requested (Which job): SCP-173 Steam ID: 76561198845292011 Hello, this is my first Pac3, It's quite the unorthodox one too. The reason for this Pac3's lack of features is due to the fact that when I have asked in-game moderators their opinions on this 173 specific...

What does this suggestion add: Adds visible ability cooldowns for SCP-079 players when hovering over potential hacks, I.E: Lockdown (Cooldown - 30 seconds remaining) (Additionally): Adds the ability for SCP-079 to access how many SCPs are breached/can actually breach [Scales with Server Pop]...

Thanks Bro.

Rant: Alright I'm just going to put it out here, 079's new rework is hella buggy, It's a fun rework that is something I'm sure everyone can vouch for but his new kit is so buggy. From bugged breach queues to having to resort to typing 'record 1;stop' every time his ui breaks it's clear he has a...

+SUPPORT PLEASE LET HIM BE BUFFED SL.

I enjoy some of these ideas, however for the 5 minute silent breach status on the breach status machine might I suggest it be base-kit for the first 5-10 minutes of one of 079's breaches. I've had breaches as 079 last less than 3 minutes due to e-11 and other MTF sweeping HCZ for samples when...

Oh alright, thanks for this, Seems kind of annoying though, but I could see how it would just be exploited if it was dropped in like say D-block pit.

Has anybody else noticed that when you breach as 096 via a photo being spawned, the moment you are bucketed your photo de-spawns in the hud ui up top? Genuinely curious if any developers or SL could explain to me if this is intentional or not, I cant see why it would be and I am leaning more so...

+support, Hope this comes in with the upcoming breach queue rework.

+support

What does this suggestion change add: Add's the ability for SCP-079 to utilise the announcement system for cognitohazardous purposes. I.E: high cost + CD Ability to activate a room's speakers for the specific purpose of playing said cognitohazard, similar to the SCPI-NeT cognitohazard ability it...

+Support

-support I agree with the annoyance of low pop breaches but it needs a little more thought put into it, rather then just remove D class hacking at low pop make it an equal solution I.E: When 5+ MTF/GSD are online and 5 D class are online they are able to breach SCP's. D-Class is honestly very...