Search results

  1. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Thank you for understanding. I'm honestly losing hope and have stopped trying to debate with these people. It's straight up like talking to a wall.
  2. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/us-requires-ssl-c%C3%A9daris-dare-rov%C3%A4toires-grey-suit-pac3-lore-approval-request-3.29871/#post-213033 https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/uk-ruby-fixed-in-compliance-with-rules.25349/#post-179555...
  3. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    I never said they were malicious. Now, im always one for discussion, but I dont like talking to people who throw insults, but I'll bite. You call me a broken record, but when I look at this thread, all I see is "Rule is not needed, its about quality, not animalistic pacs." over and over...
  4. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Now, the main issue here, is the fact that staff is not telling the truth. It doesn't take much, all you have to do is go into the pac forums and look for yourself. I honestly dont know what else to tell you. There is so much evidence right here. I have links, screenshots, and more, yet you...
  5. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Please read the post and the thread. Everything has already been explained.
  6. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    You know what I mean. I said anthro because anthropomorphosized animals is too complicated of a sentence to type over and over again and i want to save people's time, like you, by not making them have to look up words just to read my suggestion. Try saying that word five times fast.
  7. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    You make no sense. You said it shouldn't be made a rule, then explained exactly why it should be put into the rules. Also, we were talking about some of your denials in particular. The screenshot of the denial on my suggestion post is one of yours. Can you please shed some light on what you...
  8. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT. Even after screenshot, links, and edits, people were still misunderstanding and trying to gaslight me that nothing is wrong, or supporting the suggestion for all the wrong reasons.
  9. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    I 100% agree. I made this rule suggestion on the premise of them not approving any animal pacs and stating that they will not approve any anymore. So if they are going in this direction, which they already have, then they should change the rules to reflect that. They either need to change the...
  10. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Great pacs. They were approved all the way back in 2023 though. There hasn't been a single approval this year.
  11. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    lol, so you did see that and didn't reply because you were wrong. Having said that, this entire thread is about staff rulings and a certain pattern to them. You're just stating the obvious that everyone already knows. Speaking of rules and threads, have you been unbanned yet? By the way, the...
  12. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    My man DID not read the thread before posting.
  13. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Thats the problem though. You do not want this rule added, but it already exists, just not in the rulebook. I dont want it added, i want players to be able to play as these characters. I fully support animalistic characters, but the staff does not. All animalistic pacs are denied, since 2024...
  14. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    You are confusing me. You just saw multiple pac denials saying the same thing and admited that the denials were shoddy. The ones that I sent you. That was not a one instance denial. I can send more if you want. You and others keep saying that it has nothing to do with animal pacs but the overall...
  15. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    You got the spirit, but I actually fully support animalistic characters as long as it makes sense. If we can have pacs that are clowns, ghosts, demons, then animalistic ones should also be allowed. The thing is, the opposite of what you're saying is happening. All animalistic pacs are now being...
  16. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Thank you, You did not specify what date that ping was so I was not aware. That denial may be back in January, but they stated that there will be no approvals for the foreseeable future and I did not see any statements that announce any changes to said statement. Having said that. Are you...
  17. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    Then could you shed some light on this please?
  18. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    It would seem that some of yall have misunderstood this suggestion. I'll restate it. Staff have stated that animalistic traits are no longer allowed on the server. This means that the rulebook needs to be updated to say that. As of right now, the rulebook is outdated.
  19. TimberedZulu115

    Rule Suggestion No animalistic models needs to be a rule.

    I understand what you're saying. But what do you have to say about your fellow staff stating that animalistic traits are no longer allowed on the server?