What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Removes the rule or ruling(can't find either) preventing D-Class from recontaining SCPs like 106 or 096 since they're both straight forward enough to not need an entire document detailing how to.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not to my knowledge
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Less uncertainty during sits about what information a D-Class would know reguarding an SCP(think 914's use)
+ Breached SCPs can be recontained by a D-Class acting 'heroically' mirroring certain stories told on the wikidot(not all D-Class are awful people)
+ Extra RP with D-Class containing certain SCPs and being rewarded or compencated by appropriate command / RP leadership(think Ethics giving an award to a D-Class or making them an immediate trustee)
+ D-Class would no longer need to be KOS'd outside of their area because all they are allowed to do is negative for the foundation, now theres some positive they can do
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- 106 is easier to recontain(though removal of the teleport into his CC would alter the easiest way to RC him)
- I cant think of another reason.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Some things might need to change to buff 106 or 096, but in general I think D-Class should be allowed to assist with recontainment, either on their own or with help from other D-Class. The only real issue I could see is them not knowing fully IC how to recontain certain SCPs, but on the other hand every SCP aside from 106 and 096 are termable, or you shoot them to 1%, cuff them, and put them back in their CC. Obviously warning a D-Class for putting 999 back in its cell is rediculous, but with the current rulings an absolutely warnable offense.
I think the possible benifits far outweigh the negatives, since it would instigate more RP from every side else then SCPs, but SCP breaches are generally not RP focused in the first place and have a distinct lack of it, so having just a bit more RP involvement with breaches would help.
Removes the rule or ruling(can't find either) preventing D-Class from recontaining SCPs like 106 or 096 since they're both straight forward enough to not need an entire document detailing how to.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not to my knowledge
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Less uncertainty during sits about what information a D-Class would know reguarding an SCP(think 914's use)
+ Breached SCPs can be recontained by a D-Class acting 'heroically' mirroring certain stories told on the wikidot(not all D-Class are awful people)
+ Extra RP with D-Class containing certain SCPs and being rewarded or compencated by appropriate command / RP leadership(think Ethics giving an award to a D-Class or making them an immediate trustee)
+ D-Class would no longer need to be KOS'd outside of their area because all they are allowed to do is negative for the foundation, now theres some positive they can do
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- 106 is easier to recontain(though removal of the teleport into his CC would alter the easiest way to RC him)
- I cant think of another reason.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Some things might need to change to buff 106 or 096, but in general I think D-Class should be allowed to assist with recontainment, either on their own or with help from other D-Class. The only real issue I could see is them not knowing fully IC how to recontain certain SCPs, but on the other hand every SCP aside from 106 and 096 are termable, or you shoot them to 1%, cuff them, and put them back in their CC. Obviously warning a D-Class for putting 999 back in its cell is rediculous, but with the current rulings an absolutely warnable offense.
I think the possible benifits far outweigh the negatives, since it would instigate more RP from every side else then SCPs, but SCP breaches are generally not RP focused in the first place and have a distinct lack of it, so having just a bit more RP involvement with breaches would help.
Game Master
Community Sup.
Group Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Event Team