Ash's SA Application (UK)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 10, 2024
14
2
61
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:132467704
Discord name:
Bright_ash24

For how long have you played on CG SCP:
Started Playing I believe 2022

Age:
19

In what country are you located?: The UK
Time zone: GMT

Character name(s):
Nyx S., Bright

Civilian name:
Dawn Ash

What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):
UK

Do you have a mic?:
Yes

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Held:
A-1 SPC
O-1 PVT
CI Gamma
GOC LCPL
DEA Special Agent

Holding:
OSA

Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:

I Hold 2 warnings One for NRP which I believe was from my time on MRP As well as one for Fail RP for Shooting Someone in Sniper Tower

Why are you applying for Site Advisor?

I am applying for Site Advisor because I want to contribute to the operational stability and integrity of the site in a meaningful way. Strong administration creates the structure that allows roleplay to thrive without becoming chaotic or inconsistent. I am particularly focused on ensuring departments work together effectively while remaining aligned with established protocol. Structure gives actions meaning when procedures are followed, decisions feel earned and authority feels legitimate. I want to help maintain an environment where roleplay remains engaging, but never loses its sense of professionalism or internal consistency. Site Advisor is not a position of spotlight authority; it is a position of responsibility. I am applying because I want to support the site's long-term structure and ensure decisions are made with consistency, fairness, and clear reasoning.
What makes you suitable for Site Administration?:

I place strong value on fairness and strict adherence to protocol. The Foundation relies on structure, and when that structure weakens, so does operational integrity. Decisions should never be driven by favouritism or emotion, they should be grounded in policy, consistency, and objective judgement. I am comfortable enforcing protocol when necessary, but I also believe fairness means listening before acting. Administration requires balance: upholding standards while remaining composed and rational. In high-pressure scenarios, I focus on chain of command, documentation, and long-term site stability rather than reactive decisions.

What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:

Some of the main responsibilities include:

  • Appointing and overseeing Department Directors to ensure departments have strong and active leadership.
  • Appointing MTF Commanders where necessary.
  • Monitoring department performance and stepping in if standards begin to slip.
  • Authorising tests that fall within standard containment and procedural limits.
  • Approving Advanced Armory usage and escalation of force when situations justify it.
  • Authorising partial site closures for trainings, large-scale events, or security concerns.
  • Managing on-site emergencies and ensuring responses follow proper protocol.
  • Coordinating with Foundation Command to ensure the site remains aligned with broader directives.
  • Overseeing GOI relations where they impact site operations.

Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:

Character Lore – Adrian Vale


Name: Adrian Vale
Clearance Level: 4
Position: Site Advisor
Background: Former Containment Procedures Specialist, Site-██

Adrian Vale began his Foundation career as a Containment Procedures Analyst at Site-██, specialising in reviewing and refining Special Containment Procedures for high-risk anomalies. His focus was not experimentation, but structural clarity ensuring containment documentation was precise, enforceable, and operationally sound. Vale became known for identifying weaknesses in procedural language that could create confusion during breach scenarios or emergency escalation. Several of his revisions were later credited with improving coordinated response times during multi-department incidents. Following a significant containment failure attributed to breakdowns in communication between Security and Research divisions, Vale was assigned to an internal review task force. Rather than placing blame on individuals, his report highlighted systemic structural issues unclear authority thresholds, inconsistent enforcement of policy, and flexible interpretations of escalation protocols. His recommendations led to revised response frameworks across multiple sites. Due to his demonstrated impartiality and strict adherence to Foundation standards, Vale was transferred into Site Administration as a Site Advisor, not as a political appointment, but as structural reinforcement.

He is recognised for:

  • Consistent enforcement of protocol regardless of rank
  • Clear, controlled communication during Code escalations
  • Analytical decision-making under pressure
  • Viewing procedure as protection, not restriction
Vale does not seek visibility. He seeks stability.
To him, containment is discipline — not improvisation.

Potential Storyline Involvement

As Site Advisor, Adrian Vale could be involved in:
  • Navigating political pressure from external organisations who question the site's response methods, requiring him to defend procedural decisions diplomatically.
  • Quietly uncovering a pattern of undocumented authorisations being approved under his name, leading to an internal investigation into forged clearance or compromised command channels.
  • Handling a morally complex situation where Ethics Committee recommendations conflict with immediate security concerns, forcing him to determine which protocol takes precedence.
  • Responding to growing unrest within lower ranks who believe Administration is overly restrictive, challenging him to maintain authority without becoming authoritarian.


Please Note I used AI for Spelling and Stature due to having Serve Dyslexia
 

SCP-Forum-thing.png



The following message is composed via consensus of the site administration team of site-65.

Hello, @bright_ash

Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation. Due to the fact that SA has no current Site Advisor positions available, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment request. This request is to be denied.

You may reapply whenever there is an opening in Site Admin.

Secure. Contain. Protect.




CONFIDENTIAL
This document may not be shared with or used by personnel below the designated clearance level.​


 
Status
Not open for further replies.