Denied Commms Suggestion

['Blue']

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:​

It makes it so that when a CI takes a foundation member keycard he has access to the foundation comms and can speak in them and that clearance level keycard would be the comms level.​

​

Possible Positives of the suggestion :​

1. It makes RolePlay better​

2. Makes it harder to find a DC​

3. Makes sence​

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:​

N/A​

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:​

Because it makes a lot of sence and it would be more fun to play deepcover and decreses the chance to be found​

 

[DoomGuy]

well, while it sounds like a cool idea I dont see it being added i mean CI already carry level 4-5 cards and that means they would just pick one up get some info note it down then drop it again to save it meaning CI would have a infinite amount of info

 

[Astralic]

Mixed/Neutral

Sounds like a cool idea but it would be quite overpowered for CI. Mayby add an ability for Foundation to scramble comms?

 

[Darren]

maybe add a system where foundation personal can detect that someone outside the faclity a intruder is using the comms comes with the benifit of being able to use comms but at the downside giving away a dc in the facility

 

[Nate Mercer / 'Tactician']

-/+ Neutral
I’m a definite fan of this idea but the easy access to Foundation comms by just having a keycard would be too chaotic but maybe a mechanic that is similar to the interrogation tool. Maybe some way of detecting it through frequency similar to how Darren has mentioned above.

 

[Silverback]

-/+ Neutral

 

[Snow]

-support

while yeah i like it, there was a similiar system on another server and it was op

 

[MazuzaM]

This was already denied a couple times wasn't it

 

[SamPaval]

Neutral leaning -Support.

This indirectly buffs DCs

And as somebody said u can just sit in your bunks as u get cl5 info

This would also goto parawatch and parawatch getting cl5 info is bad bad

 

[Darren]

This would also goto parawatch and parawatch getting cl5 info is bad bad

im sorry but if somehow a parawatch obtains a CL5 than i have something to say on the competance of mtf and the foundation players if anything i would say thats a deserved W

 

[SamPaval]

im sorry but if somehow a parawatch obtains a CL5 than i have something to say on the competance of mtf and the foundation players if anything i would say thats a deserved W

914.

 

[Darren]

914.

that is 1 way however the parawatch in that situation is in the facility and easy to get and to get a cl5 in 914 you need a cl4 on fine and you cna only upgrade 1 time so a parawatch must obtain a cl4 make it to 914 past all mtf hope he doesnt get caught use 914

 

[SamPaval]

that is 1 way however the parawatch in that situation is in the facility and easy to get and to get a cl5 in 914 you need a cl4 on fine and you cna only upgrade 1 time so a parawatch must obtain a cl4 make it to 914 past all mtf hope he doesnt get caught use 914

Getting to 914 with disguise is role of the dice u just gotta be lucky and getting a cl4 card is insanely easy

 

[Darren]

Getting to 914 with disguise is role of the dice u just gotta be lucky and getting a cl4 card is insanely easy

if a parawatch genuinely pulls that off i would let them have the info breach i -support it myself to easy to get comms

 

[SamPaval]

if a parawatch genuinely pulls that off i would let them have the info breach i -support it myself to easy to get comms

The afk consultant ?in PW

 

[Reiner Zufall]

-support
The risk of metagame is too high for this. Im 100% sure that they would still listen the secure mtf comms. During code 1 and 5s this would be too unbalanced, also cl4 wouldn't announce their position anymore because of the threat of an capture/assassination.

 

[verybobby]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @Bartholemew alen,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. This would cause way too many issues, such as metagaming, and would be highly unbalanced. We do not plan on adding a feature to "intercept" transmissions or others of the like.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​