Rule Suggestion Disallow assisting any side in a strike mission

[BlobbiMan]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Disallow assisting any side in strike missions, be it the defending or attacking side
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: No
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Having the ability to do Strike Missions without having to worry about the other faction camping an area to disallow you to get into their base
Not having to deal with multiple factions instead of just 1 per strike mission
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Nu-7 / CI / GOC get less combat during strike missions if they choose to assist
Easier Strike Misisons
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: I believe this should be accepted because strike missions are to my knowledge OOC, and it would make no sense for the other faction to assist them in the strike mission.

 

[Beson]

-1 feels like a cope post cause you couldn’t organize well enough to down a martor

 

[Charles "Ze" Whitmee]

Never been an issue that I've seen.
This is also borderline impossible to enforce, the other faction will isn't alerted to a strike mission. Do you want people to go "// STRIKE MISSION. DONT SHOOT DEA HEADING GOC" in OOC? Because that's frankly ridiculous.

Strike missions should be removed imo

 

[Dennid]

slop suggestion

 

[Wolff]

+Support

I love watching CI get nerfed

 

[Emilia Foddg]

-Support
Non-problem, not enforceable.