What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Edits the code name rule:
![1717574502872.png 1717574502872.png](https://civilnetworks.net/community/data/attachments/16/16243-b552229a5acbaf7d3b6f5db6d657e8ad.jpg)
to be accurate to the ruling made here:
![1717574565103.png 1717574565103.png](https://civilnetworks.net/community/data/attachments/16/16244-d21b45acd1e56b685a654852fda1d881.jpg)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
idk
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Rules become more accurate to rulings made!
Less confusion about the naming convention rules!
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
No
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because rules should be accurate to the narative
Edits the code name rule:
![1717574502872.png 1717574502872.png](https://civilnetworks.net/community/data/attachments/16/16243-b552229a5acbaf7d3b6f5db6d657e8ad.jpg)
to be accurate to the ruling made here:
![1717574565103.png 1717574565103.png](https://civilnetworks.net/community/data/attachments/16/16244-d21b45acd1e56b685a654852fda1d881.jpg)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
idk
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Rules become more accurate to rulings made!
Less confusion about the naming convention rules!
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
No
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because rules should be accurate to the narative