Denied Ethics Model Changes

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hypnotoad

Well-known Member
Feb 7, 2023
151
45
41
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It changes the suit and suit colour of the Ethics Committee Member and Ethics Committee Assistant jobs

Ethics Committee Member:
Suit Closed Tie model
Skin 4 (Grey)
471A2448-F26D-48B5-9EE3-DBC2034F064F.jpeg

Ethics Committee Assistant:
Suit Open Tie
Skin 2 (Blue)
9BA10361-1F18-4ED8-AD78-B1CDDA45F631.jpeg

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don’t believe so

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Change from the weird ass selections that were made in the first place
- Provide some more consistency between the suits, e.g both the ECM and ECC Suits are similar just like the O5

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- People will get confused as they are used to the old models

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Because it would just be better suit choices and colours for the jobs, not hard to change either
 

Arron 'Spectre' Shepard

Administrator
Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
May 8, 2022
126
47
91
Suggestion Denied



Hi @Hypnotoad ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

Community feedback for the ECM model is largely negative. Regarding the ECA model, currently the model is unique and easily identified which is fully intended. The suggested model looks very similar to existing models from a distance. ECAs should be easily identifiable so that players can contact them easily and O-1 can recognise them quickly for example. This would also set a precedent for a multitude of suit wearing jobs to have their color changed, likely resulting in a bland pallette that lacks unique models.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.