What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Increase the sample limit from 3L to 4L
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not for this reason, or this specific amount increaase
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Due to the clarification on the current 3L being the mixed samples from many SCPs, it leaves you with 1.5L of useable chemical. This is annoying to store and sort, and overall makes these samplings much less useful. allowing 4L to be sampled would mean that for SCPs with 2 products, an even 2L could be obtained, which fits perfectly in large beakers. This would also somewhat negate the very lacklustre results of current sampling, especially of high level SCPs like 008
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Would make it easier to build up large amounts of chemicals, and would be much more effective on SCPs that only give 1 type of fluid already
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It may slightly increase chemical farming, but overall makes much more sense for storage, collection and trading
Increase the sample limit from 3L to 4L
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not for this reason, or this specific amount increaase
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Due to the clarification on the current 3L being the mixed samples from many SCPs, it leaves you with 1.5L of useable chemical. This is annoying to store and sort, and overall makes these samplings much less useful. allowing 4L to be sampled would mean that for SCPs with 2 products, an even 2L could be obtained, which fits perfectly in large beakers. This would also somewhat negate the very lacklustre results of current sampling, especially of high level SCPs like 008
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Would make it easier to build up large amounts of chemicals, and would be much more effective on SCPs that only give 1 type of fluid already
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It may slightly increase chemical farming, but overall makes much more sense for storage, collection and trading