Content Suggestion Make a new CL4 Techie Job

Content Suggestions will be reviewed by Content Team weekly, please allow time as not everything can be reviewed at once.

Dobbz

Well-known Member
Feb 8, 2025
21
1
41
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[It will add a new Whitelisted JR. Cl4 Techie Job.]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Some apps have made this, but they were just joke suggestions like give techies a Cl4 and AA.]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[It will add more RP to fixing things and have a more serious techie job. It could also possibly add a new technition RP.]

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[None.]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[It could add a new job that would be free of minges because of it being whitelisted. It would be a better way to fix CL4+ SCPs such as 008 and other SCPs. This could also make Expert Techie a job that would need a test.]
 

dougdougjones

Well-known Member
Jan 5, 2025
18
2
41
+ SUPPORT
if done right it could actually be helpful.
“Department of Engineering Manager” or something like that.
 

Dobbz

Well-known Member
Feb 8, 2025
21
1
41
Keep Janitor and Engineer at CL1, up IT Tech to CL2, up Tech Expert to CL3 (call it Senior Engineer - Tech Expert is a shit name, sounds like what they'd call someone working at Curry's), and make a new CL4 Director job.
They should also make Tech Experts have to take a test by the CL4 job or ISD since they overseer site staff
 

Solus_16

Well-known Member
Jan 12, 2025
36
14
41
I like this, but maybe instead of just a CL4 techie job, it could be instead a CL4 site staff job. Since jobs like chef, janitor, tech expert and all that can be easily minged on with the only consequence being ISD, a way for a site staff manager to keep them under control could reduce minging and allow for job bans, promotions and other stuff, similar to how GSD, RSD, ISD, etc have CL4 jobs.

+Support
 
Nov 6, 2022
50
17
111
-Support
"Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[None.]"

Brother I could think of 5 negatives off the top of my head. There is also no need for a CL4 techie. The point of the access level system is to enforce OPSEC within the foundation. What about a techie's job requires them to know and retain information related to 008 and 682? Let alone be on the same level as someone who manages the entire site?