What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This new rule will add a rule that makes it so that SCP-939 has to either stand still next to the flare when a flare is shot nearby, or the SCP-939 can move around a little bit. (First or second offence is eligible for a verbal warning, if more than two verbal warnings are given to someone for breaking this rule, they get a warn and it builds up from there.)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don't think so...
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Makes sampling easier.
+ Makes it so that SCP-939 won't accidentally bite anyone while running around and freaking out.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Limit roleplay I guess...?
- Nothing else really....
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Just so that minges can't hop onto SCP-939 and when a flare is shot just run around the flare wildly, preventing samples from being taken. It's just annoying that people do this.
This new rule will add a rule that makes it so that SCP-939 has to either stand still next to the flare when a flare is shot nearby, or the SCP-939 can move around a little bit. (First or second offence is eligible for a verbal warning, if more than two verbal warnings are given to someone for breaking this rule, they get a warn and it builds up from there.)
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don't think so...
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Makes sampling easier.
+ Makes it so that SCP-939 won't accidentally bite anyone while running around and freaking out.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Limit roleplay I guess...?
- Nothing else really....
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Just so that minges can't hop onto SCP-939 and when a flare is shot just run around the flare wildly, preventing samples from being taken. It's just annoying that people do this.