What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
(Please dont smite me down SL.)
This suggestion would make it so that upon denial of a PAC3 by SL it can be appealed to receive community or server roleplay leadership approval (O5/Ethics/CI/GOC Leadership).
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I highly doubt it.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Often times SL will deny a PAC3 due to seeing it as not fitting within the general setting or a situation, however a lot of the time people who are reviewing the PAC3s may not be familiar with the setting or may not see something from the right perspective. Having the ability to appeal a PAC3 for community approval both actively lets the community engage with the approval/denial process of PAC3s and additionally helps to see what is something that they would be happy to see in RP.
At the end of the day it is primarily the community that engage with PAC3 usage rather than SL, therefor I believe it to only make sense for them to have the ability to have input in acceptance/denial of PAC3s.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
There is obviously the fear that a PAC3 will be denied for obvious reasons, such as low effort, evident breaks of PAC3 rules, etc. In this situation an appeal to community approval would not be appropriate, however if it was to happen it would simply result in community denial. There is also the chance that this may upset the people who originally denied the PAC3 for whatever reason.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
At the end of the day it is not typically SL interacting with the PAC3s they approve/deny and is in fact the community, so they should get a say in what they do and do not interact with. Also, they are more often than not more well-versed within the lore of situations and may offer unthought of insight.
(Please dont smite me down SL.)
This suggestion would make it so that upon denial of a PAC3 by SL it can be appealed to receive community or server roleplay leadership approval (O5/Ethics/CI/GOC Leadership).
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I highly doubt it.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Often times SL will deny a PAC3 due to seeing it as not fitting within the general setting or a situation, however a lot of the time people who are reviewing the PAC3s may not be familiar with the setting or may not see something from the right perspective. Having the ability to appeal a PAC3 for community approval both actively lets the community engage with the approval/denial process of PAC3s and additionally helps to see what is something that they would be happy to see in RP.
At the end of the day it is primarily the community that engage with PAC3 usage rather than SL, therefor I believe it to only make sense for them to have the ability to have input in acceptance/denial of PAC3s.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
There is obviously the fear that a PAC3 will be denied for obvious reasons, such as low effort, evident breaks of PAC3 rules, etc. In this situation an appeal to community approval would not be appropriate, however if it was to happen it would simply result in community denial. There is also the chance that this may upset the people who originally denied the PAC3 for whatever reason.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
At the end of the day it is not typically SL interacting with the PAC3s they approve/deny and is in fact the community, so they should get a say in what they do and do not interact with. Also, they are more often than not more well-versed within the lore of situations and may offer unthought of insight.
Donator
Trial Game Master
Moderator
MilitaryRP Staff
Developer
Programming Team
SCP-RP Staff
Group Moderator