What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Change PAC ruling:
5.3 - You can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between 1 and 1.1.
to
Combative roles can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between 1 and 1.1.
Non-combative roles can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between .9 and 1.1.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don't see any suggestions for it; I do know that at some point previously the scale rule was .9 to 1.1. After consulting with a senior admin, they were unaware when exactly the change happened, just that it may have been around the time the lore category was launched. The change seemed to have been silent, as they were unaware of the current ruling being 1 to 1.1.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
1. Short kings and queens represent.
2. More variety with PACs.
3. Allows for more accurate character representation in RP.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
1. Combatives will complain about harder to hit targets.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I just want to play a short girl
In all seriousness, I'm always for looser PAC rulings. The obvious PAC minges should be dealt with, but I believe the rules meant to catch the minges are also catching out legitimate RPers trying to make unique characters.
Change PAC ruling:
5.3 - You can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between 1 and 1.1.
to
Combative roles can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between 1 and 1.1.
Non-combative roles can only change the height of your character using “Size” and the value may only be between .9 and 1.1.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don't see any suggestions for it; I do know that at some point previously the scale rule was .9 to 1.1. After consulting with a senior admin, they were unaware when exactly the change happened, just that it may have been around the time the lore category was launched. The change seemed to have been silent, as they were unaware of the current ruling being 1 to 1.1.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
1. Short kings and queens represent.
2. More variety with PACs.
3. Allows for more accurate character representation in RP.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
1. Combatives will complain about harder to hit targets.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I just want to play a short girl
In all seriousness, I'm always for looser PAC rulings. The obvious PAC minges should be dealt with, but I believe the rules meant to catch the minges are also catching out legitimate RPers trying to make unique characters.
Donator
Moderator
MilitaryRP Staff
Trial Game Master
