SCP-RP UK: Executive Researcher Application
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:129307923
Discord name: Woras
For how long have you played on CG SCP: 3 Months (If I understand my achievement history correctly)
Total playtime: 212 hours
Age: 22
In what country are you located?: Lithuania
Time zone: Eastern European Summer Time
Character name(s):
Sr. Researcher - Dave Gusher
Civilian name - Dave Gusher
What server are you applying for?: SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
NONE.
Have you received any kicks/bans/warnings? and why?:
Yes, Naming Conventions, FailRP, FearRP, Bans
Why are you applying for Executive Researcher?:
I'm driven to take this position for several reasons. First, I crave to get access to dangerous SCPs and get to that containment chamber as fast as possible, not wasting any minutes. I want my work to be a live influence on other researchers.
Secondly, when getting access to exclusive SCPs, it's the excitement that goes through my veins and it drives me to work in detail, it's just a privilege I wouldn't take lightly.
Furthermore, I genuinely enjoy knowledge. Teaching junior researchers with their encounters with SCPs and different samples is a rewarding experience and it's crucial for our team's success.
What makes you suitable for Executive Researcher?
I believe I'm a strong candidate for Executive Researcher!
I look at researching like it's my hobby; walking through the whole facility to get your document signed for approval from the higher-ups, doing the test according to plan, checking in with other researchers to see if they're available to join you. I think I am suitable for Executive Researcher, because my work is mostly done not with paperwork, but with interactions, and those interactions sometimes feel like they are way out of my league, but I still defeat any obstacles in my way and continue with my research. I see, I learn, I get to work.
How many excellent-graded documents have you written? What makes a document excellent?
Definitely 1, but could be more, maybe I'm wrong. What makes a document excellent is your own participation in the test with details. Lots of times I see a document from other researchers not include any personal interactions, and they just feel like you're reading a novel with almost no engagement, but your document should FEEL engaging and should make you motivated to re-do the test again, but with different approaches. Grammar and punctuation is also very vital in documenting, proper redaction of classified information. Document shouldn't be too long or too short.
Executive Researchers serve as role models for junior researchers. Responsibilities include:
Proof-reading any researchers documents, if they are trying to serve the document to the higher ups (Ethics), keeping researchers in check, talking with them, trying to invite them to your own tests so they can learn and adapt. Let's not forget about creating lectures, so people can come and take important notes. Executive researchers should also not be biased and give a review of the document that's being given, meaning an appropriate grade reflects documentation. Execs can also approve or deny tests if they seem unethical or wrong, including an explanation too.
Please give some lore about your Executive Researcher character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Dave Gusher, a very curious researcher at Armament factory craved something more. Cryptic email was received from a secret company. They offered him a glimpse into the facility after signing an NDA. Dave was sceptical, but remained calm and found himself to be kind of enjoying the job. Many secrets for Dave were too hard to resist, so he kept working harder. In the armament factory - you're a factory worker, In this facility where he works - you're a monster whisperer... kind of.
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:129307923
Discord name: Woras
For how long have you played on CG SCP: 3 Months (If I understand my achievement history correctly)
Total playtime: 212 hours
Age: 22
In what country are you located?: Lithuania
Time zone: Eastern European Summer Time
Character name(s):
Sr. Researcher - Dave Gusher
Civilian name - Dave Gusher
What server are you applying for?: SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
NONE.
Have you received any kicks/bans/warnings? and why?:
Yes, Naming Conventions, FailRP, FearRP, Bans
Why are you applying for Executive Researcher?:
I'm driven to take this position for several reasons. First, I crave to get access to dangerous SCPs and get to that containment chamber as fast as possible, not wasting any minutes. I want my work to be a live influence on other researchers.
Secondly, when getting access to exclusive SCPs, it's the excitement that goes through my veins and it drives me to work in detail, it's just a privilege I wouldn't take lightly.
Furthermore, I genuinely enjoy knowledge. Teaching junior researchers with their encounters with SCPs and different samples is a rewarding experience and it's crucial for our team's success.
What makes you suitable for Executive Researcher?
I believe I'm a strong candidate for Executive Researcher!
I look at researching like it's my hobby; walking through the whole facility to get your document signed for approval from the higher-ups, doing the test according to plan, checking in with other researchers to see if they're available to join you. I think I am suitable for Executive Researcher, because my work is mostly done not with paperwork, but with interactions, and those interactions sometimes feel like they are way out of my league, but I still defeat any obstacles in my way and continue with my research. I see, I learn, I get to work.
How many excellent-graded documents have you written? What makes a document excellent?
Definitely 1, but could be more, maybe I'm wrong. What makes a document excellent is your own participation in the test with details. Lots of times I see a document from other researchers not include any personal interactions, and they just feel like you're reading a novel with almost no engagement, but your document should FEEL engaging and should make you motivated to re-do the test again, but with different approaches. Grammar and punctuation is also very vital in documenting, proper redaction of classified information. Document shouldn't be too long or too short.
Executive Researchers serve as role models for junior researchers. Responsibilities include:
Proof-reading any researchers documents, if they are trying to serve the document to the higher ups (Ethics), keeping researchers in check, talking with them, trying to invite them to your own tests so they can learn and adapt. Let's not forget about creating lectures, so people can come and take important notes. Executive researchers should also not be biased and give a review of the document that's being given, meaning an appropriate grade reflects documentation. Execs can also approve or deny tests if they seem unethical or wrong, including an explanation too.
Please give some lore about your Executive Researcher character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Dave Gusher, a very curious researcher at Armament factory craved something more. Cryptic email was received from a secret company. They offered him a glimpse into the facility after signing an NDA. Dave was sceptical, but remained calm and found himself to be kind of enjoying the job. Many secrets for Dave were too hard to resist, so he kept working harder. In the armament factory - you're a factory worker, In this facility where he works - you're a monster whisperer... kind of.
