For the Respective Eyes of Site Administration and Above
Position: Site Advisor
Location: Site-65, Canada
Applicant: Aidan Archon
Current Assignment: ████████ Assistant
Status: Pending Approval
Known Information:
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:1:580847085
Discord name:
mclean06
For how long have you played on CG SCP:
4 years with around 1100 hours
Age:
19
In what country are you located?:
Ireland
Time zone:
GMT
Character name(s):
Foundation:
ISD/GSD/E-11: Jordan Archon
OSA: 'Elias' Archon
CI: Thorn
GOC: Michael 'Thorn'
Civilian name:
Thomas Thorn
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):
UK
Do you have a mic?:
Yes
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Holding:
MTF E-11 PVT
ISD Commissioner
Overseer Assistant
GSD Captain
CI-G
SCP-096
SCP-22415
Held:
DEA Senior Agent
GSD Security Sergeant x2
CI-D
GOC CPL
E-11 CPL
IA Ambassador
ISD Inspector
GenSec Officer
Nu-7 CPL x4
E-11 CPL x3
Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:
I have no active warnings or bans
STEAM_0:1:580847085
Discord name:
mclean06
For how long have you played on CG SCP:
4 years with around 1100 hours
Age:
19
In what country are you located?:
Ireland
Time zone:
GMT
Character name(s):
Foundation:
ISD/GSD/E-11: Jordan Archon
OSA: 'Elias' Archon
CI: Thorn
GOC: Michael 'Thorn'
Civilian name:
Thomas Thorn
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):
UK
Do you have a mic?:
Yes
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Holding:
MTF E-11 PVT
ISD Commissioner
Overseer Assistant
GSD Captain
CI-G
SCP-096
SCP-22415
Held:
DEA Senior Agent
GSD Security Sergeant x2
CI-D
GOC CPL
E-11 CPL
IA Ambassador
ISD Inspector
GenSec Officer
Nu-7 CPL x4
E-11 CPL x3
Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:
I have no active warnings or bans
Not to be shared unless approved by a Relevant Source
Why are you applying for Site Advisor?
I’m applying for Site Advisor because I’m ready to take on a larger role within the foundation and contribute to the site on a broader scale. This position would allow me to create and influence RP scenarios far beyond the scope of what I can currently do. I genuinely enjoy being involved with all departments, as each offers unique and engaging RP opportunities, and I’d love the chance to support them even further.
I also believe I’m a strong candidate for this role, especially given my experience as an Overseer Assistant, which—while not identical to administration—still involves observing site operations and facilitating RP at a high level. This background has given me a good foundation for what Site Administration handles.
I feel that it’s the right time for me to advance, as I know I can contribute more to the server. My long-term goal is to work my way through Site Administration and eventually become a Site Director, a role I’m confident I could excel in.
While I enjoy my current position as Commissioner, I believe Site Advisor suits me better and would be more fulfilling. After my previous application being denied due to a communication issue I refused to let myself get beaten down by my previous mistakes and I've came back gunning for the position once again and I won't fail to continue to gun for this position as I currently only want to join the Site Administration team and hopefully build and expand upon it.
What makes you suitable for Site Administration?
I am well-suited for Site Administration because I have extensive experience handling site-wide issues. In ISD, I regularly deal with FLC-related incidents as well as repairing damaged relations caused by misconduct or mistaken actions, especially through my work leading the relations unit as Commissioner. Additionally, my years on the server have given me first-hand experience in every department, allowing me to understand each one’s purpose, expectations, leadership duties, and internal needs.
Since Site Administration appoints most Department Directors and MTF Commanders—outside of RSD and ISD—having an in-depth understanding of each department is essential. My familiarity with what defines strong leadership and effective departmental function gives me an advantage over applicants who lack that background. With the experience I have, it would be a missed opportunity not to elevate someone who thoroughly understands the responsibilities involved.
Creativity is another strength of mine, and it significantly enhances RP creation. I’ve participated in numerous player-driven RP events and have learned from each, refining my sense of quality RP and how to develop it further.
I’m also a professional and dependable individual who takes pride in my work and consistently puts in effort. If given the opportunity to join Site Administration, I would apply these qualities to support and elevate the team.
I also consider myself approachable and willing to assist anyone—both in and out of RP. I believe I could bring a positive and refreshing presence to Site Administration, complementing an already strong group.
Finally, my dedication and willingness to persist in pursuing this role will be endless and I'm like this just generally. Getting someone willing to stay so dedicated to a role is crucial in my opinion and I fit that description, if you were to pick me for the role you would see that clear as day and I could genuinely give an added benefit to Site Administration.
What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?
1. Departmental Review, Control and Management
Appointment of Department Directors and MTF Commanders:
Site Administration is responsible for selecting and managing Directors for most on-site departments, with the exceptions of ISD and RSD.
Department & MTF Performance Management:
They monitor and evaluate departmental and MTF activity, ensuring operations meet Foundation expectations and standards.
Audits & Reviews:
If a department or MTF shows signs of underperformance, disorganization, or disloyalty, Site Administration may conduct audits or enforce corrective action.
2. Department Liaison and GOI Relations
Departmental Liaison Assignments:
Each Site Advisor serves as a liaison for one department per month, concluding the term with a detailed performance and feedback report.
GOI Relations Oversight:
They must stay informed on and involved with any GOI-related events or interactions involving the site, ensuring proper containment and diplomacy.
3. General CL4 Duties
They have the authority to authorize AA, activate FSL, and manage other high-level systems such as Tesla gates during containment or contamination events.
4. Administrative Duties
Tribunal & Investigations:
Site Advisors may act as tribunal members for lower-level staff offenses and can serve as neutral judicial figures during ISD investigations with Ethics Committee approval.
Testing Authorization:
They can authorize experiments and operational testing that do not require ethical review.
Site-Wide Policy Management:
They review, approve, or veto new policies, site-wide operations, and projects.
Authorization of Partial Site Closures:
They may approve temporary department or zone closures for events, training, or operational needs.
5. Control of Critical Situations
Crisis Response Management:
Site Advisors lead and oversee emergency situations, determining appropriate code levels, deploying ERT, authorizing AA, and maintaining awareness of all active threats so they can respond appropriately and efficiently.
Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
SCP FOUNDATION – PERSONNEL DOSSIER
Clearance Level: Junior Level 4 (Pending Elevation to Senior Level 4)
File ID: ARCHON-AIDAN/65-ASSIST/ADV-PEND
Current Status: ACTIVE – Appointment Under Review
Compiled By: –4 Authorized Records Division
I. PERSONNEL IDENTIFICATION
Name: Aidan Michael Archon
Alias(es): “Aidy”
Sex: Male
Date of Birth: 15 August ████
Place of Birth: Chicago, Illinois
Nationality: American
Current Assignment: ████████ Assistant, Site-65
Pending Position: Site Advisor, Site-65 (Review In Progress)
Security Clearance: Junior Level 4(Senior Level 4 Conditional Pending)
Psych Eval Summary:
Subject displays high charisma, strong persuasive capability, elevated confidence, and a well-maintained outward persona. Evaluators note effective interpersonal communication, superior social navigation, and a demonstrated ability to maintain operational secrecy. Alcohol dependency history acknowledged; currently categorized as “managed and non-detrimental to duty.”
II. BACKGROUND & HISTORY
Aidan Archon grew up in Chicago alongside his elder brother Jordan Archon, developing a close yet competitive sibling dynamic. Their upbringing involved construction work, customer-facing retail, and mechanical trades.
Early Civilian Life:
- Co-owner/operator of Archon Tiling & Flooring, Chicago-based flooring and contracting company.
- Corner store operator
- Automotive salesman
- Auto mechanic
- Sustained traumatic injury during automotive repair: loss of all toes on right foot after collapse of a car jack.
Family Military Outline:
- Father: Michael Archon – U.S. Army, Vietnam
- Brother: Jordan Archon – U.S. Marine Corps Corporal; later CoBRA special operations, SSGT
- Aidan: Enlistment attempt denied due to active alcohol dependency and concurrent rehabilitation.
Aidan developed a recurring sense of inadequacy compared to Jordan, motivating later career-driven behavior.
III. FOUNDATION INVOLVEMENT
The Archon brothers were unintentionally exposed to Foundation operations through their contracting business.
Exposure Event – Site-65:
While performing floor reconstruction at Site-65, Jordan Archon recognized and greeted a restricted-contact staff member by name—behavior inconsistent with expected amnestic response efficiency.
Subsequent investigation identified:
- Past drug abuse during Jordan’s earlier Foundation employment (prior to termination).
- Multiple policy violations associated with substance use.
- Incomplete memory suppression due to amnestic tolerance.
- Jordan had quietly informed Aidan months earlier.
Both brothers were detained once behavioral inconsistencies were observed. Due to:
- Jordan’s resistance to memory alteration,
- Aidan’s now-irreversible knowledge exposure, and
- Favorable evaluations,
–4 authorized their recruitment under controlled conditions.
Both were assigned as Overseer Assistants with cross-departmental logistical authority.
IV. CURRENT PERFORMANCE
Aidan has shown:
- High adaptability
- Exceptional interpersonal communication
- Strong reliability with classified material
- Effective negotiation and de-escalation ability
- Consistent professional conduct
His personal life is stable, with supportive spousal and family dynamics. Alcohol use remains monitored but manageable. He states dissatisfaction with the “Assistant” role, prompting his application for elevation to Site Advisor.
V. PERSONALITY NOTES
- Highly charismatic; often resolves interdepartmental tension through dialogue alone.
- Exhibits controlled self-confidence.
- Enjoys ice cream, pizza, wine, and vodka—the latter two under routine health monitoring.
- Strong dedication to stability and professional advancement.
VI. RELATED PERSONNEL FILES (ABRIDGED)
A. Jordan Archon – Overseer Assistant
File ID: ARCHON-JORDAN/ASSIST
- Former USMC Corporal; later CoBRA SSGT.
- Documented history of drug abuse leading to early Foundation termination.
- Demonstrates partial-to-full resistance to standard amnestics.
- Recruited alongside Aidan after exposure incident confirmation.
- Provides physical security coordination and special operations support.
- More impulsive and volatile than Aidan; requires scheduled psychological oversight.
B. Spousal & Dependent File – Archon Household
Spouse: █████ Archon
- Civilian.
- Cleared for Level 0–1 Domestic Awareness Only.
- Positive stabilizing influence on subject.
Children:
- Aidan Archon Jr. (Age █)
- No anomalous indicators.
- No anomalous indicators.
Family stability contributes significantly to Aidan’s psychological resilience.
VII. MEDICAL & PSYCHIATRIC OVERVIEW
Medical:
- Missing toes on right foot; minor gait modification.
- No critical ongoing medical issues.
- Alcohol dependency: controlled.
Psychiatric:
- Mild inferiority complex related to Jordan.
- Otherwise stable; emotionally balanced.
- Recommended for bi-annual counseling sessions.
VIII. COMMAND REVIEW
–4’s Note:
“Aidan demonstrates composure, loyalty, and a firm grasp of administrative operations. His capabilities and disposition align with the responsibilities required of a Site Advisor. Further review pending.”
IX. STATUS
Promotion to Site Advisor:
PENDING | Decision Expected: ████-██-██
Risk Level: Low
Trustworthiness Index: High
Operational Value: High
SCP FOUNDATION – INTERVIEW LOG
File ID: INT-ARCHON-AIDAN/–4-PRM-65
Date: ██/██/20██
Location: Site-65, Administrative Interview Chamber A-3
Participants:
–4 (Interviewer)
Aidan Michael Archon (Interviewee; Overseer Assistant; Promotion Candidate)
Purpose: Evaluation of subject’s suitability for potential elevation to Site Advisor, assessment of loyalty, temperament, and internal alignment.
BEGIN LOG
00:00
–4: You may sit. This is not a disciplinary review.
Aidan: (sits, adjusts tie) Could’ve fooled me with the room choice. Nothing says “relax” like windowless concrete. But thank you.
00:21
–4: You’ve applied for the Site Advisor role. Before that request proceeds, I need to assess your mindset.
Why do you believe you're suited for the position?
Aidan: I’ve been doing half of the Advisor workload already—liaison work, internal coordination, smoothing over disagreements between departments that forget each other are human.
I’m good with people. I don’t break under pressure. And I don’t take this place for granted.
00:53
–4: You have a notable past with alcohol dependency.
State, for the record, your current control status.
Aidan: Controlled, stable, monitored. I drink socially, not habitually. My medical reports back that up.
I’m not the man I used to be. I’ve got things to lose now—my wife, my kids, and this job.
01:22
–4: Your brother’s history is… complicated.
How does Jordan’s volatility affect your own performance?
Aidan: Jordan’s Jordan. Loud, impulsive, too brave for his own good.
But he’s my brother. I don’t babysit him, but I understand him.
If anything, seeing him stumble made me straighten myself out. I’m not him. I don’t want to be him.
I just want to be better—for myself, my family, and this Foundation.
01:58
–4: Our observations show you're more stable, more socially grounded.
Why do you think that is?
Aidan: Because I don’t hide behind bravado. I talk. I listen.
I’ve run a store, sold cars, fixed cars, worked in basements and backrooms and broken-down garages.
You learn how to deal with people—real people—before dealing with the anomalous.
And… having a wife and kids forces you to grow up fast.
02:36
–4: You were not originally intended to know about the Foundation.
Yet you adapted far faster than most forced-recruits.
Why?
Aidan: Because once I’m in a situation, I commit.
You don’t run from this kind of responsibility. You learn, you adjust, and you stay quiet.
This place deals with things that could wipe the whole world off the map.
If I can help keep that contained—
(pauses)
—then that’s what I’m going to do.
03:11
–4: Describe, concisely, your philosophy on leadership.
Aidan: Simple:
Don’t let the people beneath you feel beneath you.
Treat them like they matter.
Because they do. Every researcher, guard, janitor—everyone keeps this place alive.
If they trust you, they work better. If they work better, we all stay alive.
That’s leadership.
03:42
–4: You have charm. Confidence. A convincing presence.
But Site Advisors deal with classified catastrophes.
Are you prepared for decisions that may cost lives?
Aidan: Nobody’s prepared for that.
But I won’t freeze, and I won’t lie to myself about what this job is.
If the situation demands the hard call, I’ll make it—
and I’ll carry the weight myself, not dump it on my subordinates.
04:10
–4: Your record shows no breaches in trust.
No leaks.
No lapses.
Why should I personally trust you with site-level authority?
Aidan: Because I know what happens if I fail.
I’ve seen things most people shouldn’t even imagine.
And because…
(leans forward slightly)
…I don’t want power. I want responsibility.
There’s a difference.
The first serves you. The second serves everyone else.
I’m here for the latter.
04:52
–4: (silent for several seconds)
Very well.
Your responses will be added to your evaluation file.
Is there anything else you wish to state on record before this interview concludes?
Aidan: Just this:
If I’m given the Advisor role, I won’t let Site-65 down.
And I won’t let you down, either.
05:19
–4: Then we are finished.
You will be contacted once a decision is reached.
Aidan: Thank you, sir.
(stands, nods respectfully, exits)
END LOG
Decision Status: Review Pending
Evaluator Comment (–4):
“Competent. Composed. Stable.
Recommend continued observation.
Promotion likely.”
SCP FOUNDATION – INTERVIEW LOG
File ID: INT-ARCHON-JORDAN/–4-SUPP
Date: ██/██/20██
Location: Site-65, Security Interview Chamber S-2
Participants:
–4 (Interviewer)
Jordan Archon (Interviewee; Overseer Assistant)
Purpose: To gauge the psychological and operational implications of Aidan Archon’s pending elevation to Site Advisor and assess Jordan’s stability, loyalty, and expectations in response.
BEGIN LOG
00:00
–4: Sit, please.
Jordan: (drops into the chair without breaking eye contact) I’m already sitting. Let’s get this over with.
00:14
–4: Your brother, Aidan, has submitted an application for Site Advisor.
We’re reviewing personnel reactions.
I want your honest stance.
Jordan: My stance?
(snorts)
Yeah, he’s good for it. Better than most people here, frankly.
00:32
–4: Elaborate.
Jordan: Look—Aidan’s the golden boy.
He talks right, walks right, never pisses off the wrong person.
He’s got that charm. Could sell anyone a car they already own.
And he doesn’t crack under pressure.
He’s not… (waves hand vaguely) …me.
00:56
–4: You sound resentful.
Jordan: Nah.
Not resentful.
Just realistic.
He’s always been the one who made people comfortable. I make people nervous.
That’s what the Marines taught me. That’s what CoBRA taught me.
Different tools for different jobs.
01:21
–4: Would his promotion affect your own performance?
Jordan: No.
If anything, it’d make things easier. People listen to him more than they listen to me.
He says “calm down,” they calm down.
I say it, they think I’m threatening them.
(shrugs) Not wrong, half the time.
01:46
–4: Aidan describes you as impulsive.
What’s your response?
Jordan: (laughs once, sharp)
He’s right.
But “impulsive” kept me alive in places where thinking too long got you shot.
He’s methodical.
I’m instinct.
Together?
We work. That’s why your people hired us instead of scrapping us.
02:12
–4: Are you concerned he will outrank you?
Jordan: I don’t give a damn about rank.
Rank’s just paperwork and headaches.
I want to do what I’m good at—security coordination, field response, the dirty jobs.
Aidan wants the office, the meetings, the conversations.
He’s built for Advisor.
And hell, if he outranks me?
Good. Maybe he’ll finally pay for lunch.
02:42
–4: Do you believe your brother is loyal to the Foundation?
Jordan: He’s loyal to the idea of the Foundation.
The mission. The secrecy. The protection.
He takes it serious.
He knows what happens if this place screws up.
And between you and the recorder?
He’s the only guy I trust to make the kind of calls you Advisors make.
03:10
–4: How would you react if Aidan failed in the role?
Jordan:
(leans back, jaw tightening)
If he failed, it wouldn’t be because he wasn’t good enough.
It’d be because something broke him.
And if something breaks my brother—
(points a finger)
—I’m breaking whatever did it.
Simple as that.
03:34
–4: That level of protectiveness could be a liability.
Jordan: Only if you put me in the wrong place at the wrong time.
You keep me where I belong—boots on the ground, not behind a desk—and it won’t be an issue.
03:53
–4: Final question:
Do you personally think Aidan is ready?
Jordan:
(long pause)
Yeah.
He’s been ready since before either of us were dragged into this place.
He just needed someone to notice.
If you give him the Advisor job, he won’t let you down.
If you don’t…
Well.
He’ll just keep proving you wrong until you do.
END LOG
Evaluator Comment (–4):
“Subject demonstrates emotional volatility but stable operational alignment.
Support for Aidan’s promotion genuine; no indicators of internal sabotage or resentment.
Continue monitoring.”
Last edited:
Game Master
Donator
