Denied Change combat medic bunks to CL4

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
May 18, 2024
12
0
61
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:

This suggestion proposes increasing the clearance level required to access Combat Medic bunks from CL3 to CL4. This change tightens security protocols by limiting access to a highly sensitive area and ensures only authorized combat-oriented personnel can enter. It effectively removes general CL3 personnel, including non-combatives, from having routine access to the Combat Medic living quarters and connected armory spaces.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:

After reviewing existing proposals, I was unable to locate a directly comparable suggestion. While some access-related changes have been discussed previously, none appear to specifically target the Combat Medic bunk area or involve a CL3-to-CL4 escalation. This suggestion is unique in its focus on operational readiness and emergency accessibility for Combat Medics.


Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

  • Improved Site Security: Restricting access ensures that D-Class personnel or any unauthorized individuals (e.g., researchers, technicians) cannot gain proximity to the Combat Medic armory or living spaces.
  • Enhanced Emergency Responsiveness: Combat Medics will be able to enter and exit their bunks swiftly during emergencies without clearance delays or crowding caused by unrelated personnel.
  • Policy Enforcement: Promotes stricter adherence to Foundation departmental boundaries discouraging casual or unauthorized entry into bunks.


Possible Negatives of the suggestion:


  • Inconvenience for Non-Medics: Staff who previously used the area as a shortcut or informal meeting point may now need to reroute through designated public or department-specific zones.
  • Dependency on Nearby Armories: Site personnel seeking quick access to equipment may now have to rely solely on the Security Sector or Delta Armory, which could create minor delays in lower-risk scenarios


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:

Shifting access to CL4 for Combat Medic bunks is a strategic improvement to site safety, operational discipline, and role clarity. It safeguards critical resources (such as medical and combat equipment) from misappropriation or accidental interference and ensures Combat Medics are not hindered during high-pressure responses.
In doing so, it also reinforces proper Foundation protocol — preventing overreach from other departments and reducing the risk of conflicts or access violations. While it may introduce slight logistical detours for some, the broader benefit to combat readiness and site integrity makes this a valuable and necessary change.
 
Last edited:
-Support
It should be CL5 instead :schizotroll:
5? Why limmit your self Go CL6 Bio. Make the administrator spawn in the CM bunks while we are at it.

Trolling asside. Why? If D-Class are breaking out and getting in to CM bunks all the time go to GSD and tell em off.

Ofc the no brainer. Why would CMs (a white list job that can be done in like 5mins) be a CL4/in a CL4 area?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
-Support
As a former DoM and Current CoS I can say this would severely inhibit the combatives on site that regularly use that armory for armor, ammo, and scrambles. There would be absolutely no reason I can think of for this to be needed other than the fact that it gets left open often which like isn't that big of a problem as there are no weapons d class would be able to get in there.
 
-Support
As a former DoM and Current CoS I can say this would severely inhibit the combatives on site that regularly use that armory for armor, ammo, and scrambles. There would be absolutely no reason I can think of for this to be needed other than the fact that it gets left open often which like isn't that big of a problem as there are no weapons d class would be able to get in there.
Also your example of the code of ethics trespassing code doesn't include the medical contracts in place with the medical cl4 team and other departments that allow that armories specific use for them.
 
The issue that it seems you're trying to address is an In-Character one. This isn't something that requires staff involvement to "fix." Firstly, there are multiple valid reasons for combative personnel to access that armory which to my knowledge Medical Leadership endorse. Players abusing the armory should be dealt with by ISD or their respective department leadership. Increasing the clearance is typically never a good solution to a problem. Look at SCP-500. Rarely do players ever experiment on it or use it ever since it was moved up to CL4.
-Support
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sneefo
May 18, 2024
12
0
61
so the idea of bringing this up in character is a great idea please find me the medical department heads because they are rarely online you can easily wait around all night and non will come online i have tried before to bring this issue up in character but lack of medical leadership is the reason this is a suggestion and not being brought up in character
 

Holland

Administrator
Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
Aug 27, 2022
485
141
111
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Dan1997 ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

We don't believe a staff or content change is needed to solve this problem, as it isn't a major issue affecting server health. This can be addressed internally by enforcing the FLC or any IC rule that can be made or is already in place. Players/department are expected to roleplay scenarios where unauthorised personnel enter a restricted space.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Status
Not open for further replies.