Accepted Fully hide 079 from tab list

This suggestion has been accepted for future development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

LazerNick37

Active member
Feb 22, 2026
6
4
21
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This is a suggestion for 079 to be completely hidden on the tab list from all factions to prevent metagaming.

It is no secret that metagaming is a problem that exists in the server, and SCP-079 is arguably the scp that is the most affected by it. Whenever something odd happens, like a door opening in a way that cant be explained, some player's first action is checking the tab list to see if 079 is on-site, and if they arn't they dont even bother to check 079 CC because they already know their not on, so why even bother! As an example, while I was sitting in breach queue writing this suggestion (as 079) two people came and checked my CC to see if I was breached. And while I am not in E-11, I severely doubt 079 is routinely checked when he isn't flagged on.

As a side note, even if someone isn't intentionally metagaming, seeing 079 in tab list can still affect someone's decision making if they see something unexplained, as it is hard to pretend to act in character if you have meta knowledge, even accidentally.

--
(please read the negatives section before reading this or it wont make as much sense)
Despite the fact that a researcher can no longer use the tab list to discern if 079 is flagged on for a test, realistically in my two months playing on CN I have never seen or heard of a 079 test. While im sure at least a few have been done in the history of the server, 079 is an scp that is tested on so rarely that this negative side would not affect the server the vast majority of the time. Additionally, should a researcher actually want to do a 079 test, they can simply as for 079 to flag on in OOC and, provided that 079 is not afk (which would make testing impossible anyway) 079 could tell the researcher that they are available for testing.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
No, not to my knowledge.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- impossible to metagame 079
- 079's "silent breach" is truly undetectable

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Researcher's cannot check tab list to see if 079 is flagged on (please read the end of the first section)

Based on the Positives and Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Overall, I believe that this suggestion should be accepted because this would solve 079's issue of metagaming, as well as the one perceivable downside being negligible and solvable with two OOC messages.
 
+Support

Although I myself have never played as SCP-079, I can understand the frustration that comes with playing SCP-079. I can understand this as a player who does not intend to metagame, but rather often, falls into a curiosity trap of wondering if there is an 079 player active. Even though this is not malicious, it does create the unconscious bias of knowing whether to check 079 as a containment breach etc.

The postitives seem to overwhemingly outweigh the negatives. I have never once seen an 079 test and I often have encountered possibilities of people metagaming 079 both intentionally and indirectly due to our curious nature as humans.

Overall, I don't see why not.
 
Although I'm pretty new with 079, I completely agree with the suggestion Nick made.
I have breached as 079 twice, both times as sneaky as possible and yet i got pretty quickly recontained.

+Support
 
We love the Cope

Changing the Tab menu will not affect E-11 checking 079 every time a scare of him being CB happens
This would do literally nothing

As a reminder Breaching a SCP that is a Loud breach will 100% lead to the CC being checked and your later RC ;P
Hi, of course I am aware that if I breach a loud scp, I will most likely be checked and RC'd. That is simply not the point of this suggestion. The aim of this suggestion is to prevent my existence from being meta'd whilst I am building levels, or after I have breached a silent scp, such as 966. The statement "This would literally do nothing" is also innaccurate, because believe it or not, when an 079 "Scare" happens, I bet a solid amount of E-11 just check tab list before even checking CC to see if 079 is breached.

Thinking metagaming is unfun ≠ coping
Cope suggestion on top of the currently existing one.

-Support
this goes for this as well
 
+support

There is one suggetion same as yours but it's same good as one.


Cope suggestion on top of the currently existing one.

-Support
We love the Cope

Changing the Tab menu will not affect E-11 checking 079 every time a scare of him being CB happens
This would do literally nothing

As a reminder Breaching a SCP that is a Loud breach will 100% lead to the CC being checked and your later RC ;P
Isn't it ironic that those staff members do not support this suggetion? Not pointing fingers and i know your in E-11 but you are in staff soooo.
 
I love people accusing me of liking metagaming and even making a bit about this regarding me being staff (???) but anyways.

It's a cope suggestion. That's fine, I have written cope suggestions, no one is immune for wanting things to be better for them.

BUT

This "feature" has been logged on the dev tracker for about... a month and 10 days.
 
  • Cool
Reactions: Porrin

Proof!
Hey, I appreciate the citing of the previous suggestion. When I was searching for previous suggestions I was looking for things related to 079, not SCP obfuscation in general, but I do agree that it solves the problem. The way you worded your original comment simply rubbed me the wrong way, espescially since you didn't originally cite where the duplicate suggestion was from, and I felt it was unprofessional coming from a member of the staff team.
 
You would not want lose staff role by breaking a rule right?
If you think a member of staff has broken the rules, feel free to make a complaint in the relevant forums!


Hey, I appreciate the citing of the previous suggestion. When I was searching for previous suggestions I was looking for things related to 079, not SCP obfuscation in general, but I do agree that it solves the problem. The way you worded your original comment simply rubbed me the wrong way, espescially since you didn't originally cite where the duplicate suggestion was from, and I felt it was unprofessional coming from a member of the staff team.
Hey man I get it, I still think its a cope suggestion but dont sweat it
 
Suggestion Approved

Hi @LazerNick37 ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

Obfuscation of SCPs in the TAB menu is already planned in our Development Tracker (see here).

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.