Content Suggestion Add SCP hacking alerts to GSD SGT+ and SA+

Content Suggestions will be reviewed by Content Team weekly, please allow time as not everything can be reviewed at once.
Zen

Zen

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Community Engager Conversation Starter
Sep 16, 2023
1,371
464
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Adds SCP hacking alerts to the following:
  • GSD SGT
  • GST CPT
  • GSD MAJ
  • GSD Chief
  • Site Advisor
  • Site Manager
  • Site Director
  • O5-X
It makes no sense that only GSD SCU specifically would get these alerts, but not their superiors. What if nobody is on SCU? Especially if there's no E-11 on.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not to my knowledge.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
  • During low-medium pop, there are still hacking alerts even if there's no SCUs or E-11 on, which there often aren't below like 60 players
  • It simply makes more sense - why would an SCU get an alert, but not even their Chief?

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
  • None. Balancing isn't actually a concern here, because either:
    • There are E-11 or SCUs on, and so the hacking alert would be received and spread via comms anyway.
    • There aren't any active E-11 or SCUs, and so the site absolutely needs those hacking alerts or it's completely fucked.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This just makes sense. It's QoL for GSD, not having to have someone on SCU to get the alerts, and it makes downtime not quite as fucked because someone can no longer hack an SCP without anybody even getting an alert.
 
Upvote -3 Downvote
Neutral

Currently it makes sense that only E-11 and SCU have access to SCP hacking alerts as they are the ones dealing with it. I’d also be fine with CL4 GSD having it.

However, last thing that should be happening is all of GSD bombrushing HCZ when there is a hack going on and not needed a majority of the time, their focus (at this point it being a C1) should be defending D-block from CI and the lack of co-ordination could allow CI a easier time baiting out GSD.

I don’t see any reason why SA/O5/Ethics (left out of this suggestion 😂) needs hacking alerts for SCPs, maybe elaboration needed.
 
Snake said:
SCU stands for security containment unit
Click to expand...
Yeah. And SGT+ are their superiors and so should have the same info they have.

Rion said:
Neutral

Currently it makes sense that only E-11 and SCU have access to SCP hacking alerts as they are the ones dealing with it. I’d also be fine with CL4 GSD having it.

However, last thing that should be happening is all of GSD bombrushing HCZ when there is a hack going on and not needed a majority of the time, their focus (at this point it being a C1) should be defending D-block from CI and the lack of co-ordination could allow CI a easier time baiting out GSD.

I don’t see any reason why SA/O5/Ethics (left out of this suggestion 😂) needs hacking alerts for SCPs, maybe elaboration needed.
Click to expand...
SA+ is for similar reasons. They should have the same info or more that their subordinates do. SA especially should be coordinating emergency response, so they should 100% have hacking alerts so they can direct people appropriately.
 
Zen said:
Yeah. And SGT+ are their superiors and so should have the same info they have.


SA+ is for similar reasons. They should have the same info or more that their subordinates do. SA especially should be coordinating emergency response, so they should 100% have hacking alerts so they can direct people appropriately.
Click to expand...
That just… isn’t the role of SA? They manage the site not direct the response of C1/C5’s. If it is part of their role they do not do it often enough to be worthwhile giving it them.
 
Literally 0 downsides here. The only bad thing is CI DCs can’t breach 500 SCPs at 2am and then no rp can happen lowpop. If the downside is “GSD will swarm HCZ when they’re not needed and should be at d-block”, the counter argument is, E-11 can order GSD to leave hcz if not needed. If there’s no e-11, then it’s a good thing GSD are swarming HCZ so the DCs can be killed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zen
CI here.

I’d be willing personally to have this with a delay. Kind of like 008 quarantine hacking alert where it goes off 30 seconds after. So maybe it could be like a 15-30 second delay and that way if E-11 / SCU is on they can call it out immediately still and if they’re on but afk or not on then foundation still have a chance to see when something is being hacked.
 
Yoyo said:
No.... there can already be so many E-11 and 2 SCU's who get these alerts. This would make it way unbalanced for CI. The alerts were balanced on release properly.
Click to expand...
... How? As soon as one person receives the alert, they spam comms saying there was an alert and where. Functionally, one person receiving the alert is the same as everyone on Foundation receiving the alert as a result.

Either nobody receives it, or everyone does. Right now, during downtime, nobody receives it. That is terrible at low pop. During high pop, it doesn't matter, because E-11 are on, so even if only one is active, they see it and insta send it on comms and everyone responds anyway.

This cannot ever affect balance in any way other than changing whether Foundation know or not at all.
 
I agree with SA+ 100%. General Security? Maybe they can make it so if zero E-11 or SCU's are online they can get it. General security's jurisdiction ends in HCZ, So they aren't really supposed to be combatting HCZ's threats.


I realize the sentiment, Get more combatives to heavy so we can stop the hacking quicker, But most of the time letting the gensec horde come down is more of a curse then a blessing.
 
Solus_16 said:
Literally 0 downsides here. The only bad thing is CI DCs can’t breach 500 SCPs at 2am and then no rp can happen lowpop. If the downside is “GSD will swarm HCZ when they’re not needed and should be at d-block”, the counter argument is, E-11 can order GSD to leave hcz if not needed. If there’s no e-11, then it’s a good thing GSD are swarming HCZ so the DCs can be killed.
Click to expand...
You clearly have never tried to actually do what you are suggesting. It's like pulling teeth trying to get any Gensec that are captain and below out of HCZ. You ARE a UK player so the culture might be different over there, I'll admit that.
 
vvvvvv4203 said:
You clearly have never tried to actually do what you are suggesting. It's like pulling teeth trying to get any Gensec that are captain and below out of HCZ. You ARE a UK player so the culture might be different over there, I'll admit that.
Click to expand...
Ha! in UK HCZ BDs are permanently closed so if theres no E11 online, theres no one to open the BDs (unless another CL4 comes by to open it) so there won't be any problem with getting GSD out of HCZ if no one can go to HCZ in the first place

As per the suggestion, hard - Support

You already have E11 and SCU to call the hacking alerts and i really doubt the server goes long times where there isnt any E11 connected (as E11 has a playtime requirement it usually has people playing or afk)

I could also make a suggestion to add a repair tool to armory so we can repair stuff when theres no tech experts online, but thats not the way of dealing with that
 
vvvvvv4203 said:
I realize the sentiment, Get more combatives to heavy so we can stop the hacking quicker, But most of the time letting the gensec horde come down is more of a curse then a blessing.
Click to expand...
sending the cadet horde to HCZ to stop a breach in sub 5 minutes only to spend the next 30 minutes trying to get the cadets back into LCZ
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back