Recent content by Kito

Its been ruled a bunch of times, if you're tranq'd, its in a controlled situation since you cant fight back at all, and you can be cuffed even with a weapon out. Its annoying as fuck and makes the tranq gun super powerful, but I guess thats why its given to very few people.

When I wrote the sampling guides the only thing requiring so much oversight from E-11 was 008. Why the fuck is 106 and 409 being hyper-regulated??

This would need a substantial amount of additional rulings on it to govern when a D-Class could reasonably breach 008, rules which I think stray too far into ruleplay instead of roleplay. D-Class should be allowed to hold it hostage, and negotiate their release or something, and breach it under...

I don't think this should be accepted not because its an insane take to give a commander role an LMG but more so because the change wouldn't do much overall, nor would it benefit the role in part or in whole. Just doesn't seem like the loadout needs an update or change. -Support.

Heroic sacrifice? If someones consenting to it for the greater good and justifying it by saying 'if I dont do it now then 106 will get to surface and cause more innocent deaths', then they should be allowed to. Not to mention, D-Class don't value their life much by running out of D-Block and...

I can see why the rules were introduced, mainly to prevent unstoppable infobreaches, but there should be a point in the snow clearly marked out as a 'Critical Information Breach' where there is an RP reset on surface or in general, similar to a nuke, where the world would know about the...

Realism has nothing to do with the server, or any video game. Authenticity is more applicable, and reasonable to request then realism, since if you wanted to be 'realistic' there wouldnt be a breach, no MTF, about 8 or so D-Class, GSD would get pistols instead of MP5s, medical wouldnt have...

Mostly just for gameplay purposes, if D-Class could MRDM, then you would have nothing but MRDM. There wouldnt be any RP, but there are missions people can take for money and XP that allow killing other D-Class. As for breaching SCPs, it makes sense that a D-Class might do that just to spite the...

D-Class can absolutely try to escape, and sometimes recontaining an SCP would help themselves or other D-Class escape. Not to mention the fact on occasion people are nice to D-Class, and it might give a good incentive to be more cooperative with D-Class instead of immediately firing on them...

Well 106, and 096 are CL3, so the only ones that wouldn't be recontainable would be 079 and maybe 008? If you wanna count them. Literally everything else is beam, cuff, put away, or terminate, aside from 106 and 096.

then... why are D-Class never amnesticated after tests? how would they know how to use 914? goober.

You just... hack it? Thats it?? I think all the containment procedures are extremely simple and shouldn't require an explanation at all, like the most complex containment procedure is flipping 2 levers and pressing a button while someone is in a specific room. Plus by the same logic, D-Class...

I got warned yesterday for recontaining 106 and a D-Class, asked for the rule and got ignored by the staff, so I just took the warn and tried to find the ruling, and couldnt so idk??

~ Neutral If they get breached via a blackout, I think it should remove the SCPs breach tool. I thought about how unbalanced it would be for CI to get an easy breach during a raid, but I think reactor is 3 level 5s in a row, so I think its acceptable and gives more value to a CL5. However...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Removes the rule or ruling(can't find either) preventing D-Class from recontaining SCPs like 106 or 096 since they're both straight forward enough to not need an entire document detailing how to. Has something similar been suggested before? If so...